"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am sending little bit smarter version - without redundant parsing.
Applied with corrections --- you had some memory management problems
in particular.
One thing that I think might annoy people is that you've handled
CASE x
WHEN
Hello
I am sending little bit smarter version - without redundant parsing.
When test expression is defined, then expressions in WHEN part are
modified like
$x in ( origin_expression )
$x is referenced to invisible *case* variable that carries result of
test expression.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
2
Hello
2008/5/3 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 2008/5/2 Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> How about taking a completely different strategy, and implement the
>>> CASE-WHEN construct fully natively in plpgsql, instead of trying to convert
>>>
"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2008/5/2 Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> How about taking a completely different strategy, and implement the
>> CASE-WHEN construct fully natively in plpgsql, instead of trying to convert
>> it to a single SQL CASE-WHEN expression? It's not a
Hello
2008/5/2 Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> I found some bugs when I used base_lexer, so I returned back own
>> lexer. It's only little bit longer, but simpler.
>
> Hmm. I don't like having to lex the expressions again. It just doesn't feel
> rig
Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
I found some bugs when I used base_lexer, so I returned back own
lexer. It's only little bit longer, but simpler.
Hmm. I don't like having to lex the expressions again. It just doesn't
feel right.
How about taking a completely different strategy, and implement the
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I found some bugs when I used base_lexer, so I returned back own
> lexer. It's only little bit longer, but simpler.
>
you really compile this one? i get a complain because
read_sql_construct is called with 8 argum
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Jaime Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Jaime Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > 2008/5/1 Jaime Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Jaime Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > 2008/5/1 Jaime Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> H
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> 2008/5/1 Jaime Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> I found some bugs when I used base_lexer, so I returned back own
> >> l
Hello
2008/5/1 Jaime Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I found some bugs when I used base_lexer, so I returned back own
>> lexer. It's only little bit longer, but simpler.
>>
>
> you really compile this one? i ge
11 matches
Mail list logo
