Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
Uh, wasn't this applied some time ago?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubs
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
>
> Uh, wasn't this applied some time ago?
Yes, I see it now. I am not sure why I missed the commit message. It
might have been during those few days where I had
Sorry, already applied. Thanks.
---
Reece Hart wrote:
> Okay, Tom, here's take II.
>
> warning: I've handchecked the sgml, but the doc tools I've got installed
> die when I make man within doc/src/sgml. Specifically:
>
>
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Reece Hart wrote:
> Okay, Tom, here's tak
Tom-
Here's take III of the patch, with the #ifdef for RL_PROMPT_START_IGNORE, the #else chopped, and made with diff -c against 7.4.1. A brief comment seemed warranted since this is an undocumented readline feature.
Note that the #if is:
#if defined (USE_READLINE) && defined (RL_PROMPT_START_
Reece Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The RL_PROMPT_* markers are undocumented features of readline. The patch
> I sent works fine with RL 4.2 and 4.3 on linux-x86. From the readline
> changelogs, I deduced that these were added with 4.0 (ca. Feb 1999).
Hm. I don't recall whether we still pret
On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 13:34, Tom Lane wrote:
how far back do they have support
for these RL_PROMPT_foo symbols, and do we need to consider the
possibility that the symbols aren't there or act differently?
Short answer: I believe that any readline newer than Feb 1999 oughta work.
The RL_PRO
Reece Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okay, Tom, here's take II.
Okay, now that I understand what you want to do, how portable is this
across different readline versions --- how far back do they have support
for these RL_PROMPT_foo symbols, and do we need to consider the
possibility that the sy
