Re: [PATCHES] win32 service proposal

2004-05-04 Thread Darko Prenosil
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 13:47, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > I played a bit with that code. According to Microsoft samples > > for service managers, errors and events should be logged to > > eventlog. so I added a function (almost copy of sample > > service code), it's a messy, but it was enough to see

Re: [PATCHES] win32 service proposal

2004-05-04 Thread Magnus Hagander
> I played a bit with that code. According to Microsoft samples > for service managers, errors and events should be logged to > eventlog. so I added a function (almost copy of sample > service code), it's a messy, but it was enough to see what is > happening with the service. Consider using e

Re: [PATCHES] win32 service proposal

2004-05-03 Thread Darko Prenosil
I played a bit with that code. According to Microsoft samples for service managers, errors and events should be logged to eventlog. so I added a function (almost copy of sample service code), it's a messy, but it was enough to see what is happening with the service. After testing it, I have noticed

Re: [PATCHES] win32 service proposal

2004-05-03 Thread Magnus Hagander
> Spoke about this off-list with Magnus; he's strongly for > stand-alone; I'm fence-sitting. We see that clearly there are > some niceties to having this in the postmaster (one less exe > to build/configure; same install set for win/*nix; etc), but > the downsides include minor impact on the co