Il 02/03/2016 19:40, Alvaro Herrera ha scritto:
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Moreno Andreo wrote:
... or maybe add some more RAM to have more disk caching (if you're on
*nix) this worked for me in the past... even if IMHO it's more a
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Moreno Andreo
> wrote:
> > ... or maybe add some more RAM to have more disk caching (if you're on
> > *nix) this worked for me in the past... even if IMHO it's more a
> > temporary "patch" while upgrading (if
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Moreno Andreo wrote:
> Il 02/03/2016 16:49, Scott Marlowe ha scritto:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Scott Marlowe
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Artem Tomyuk
>>>
Il 02/03/2016 16:49, Scott Marlowe ha scritto:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Artem Tomyuk wrote:
Hi.
I've noticed that autovac. process worked more than 10 minutes, during this
zabbix
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Artem Tomyuk wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I've noticed that autovac. process worked more than 10 minutes, during this
>> zabbix logged more than 90% IO disk utilization on
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Artem Tomyuk wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've noticed that autovac. process worked more than 10 minutes, during this
> zabbix logged more than 90% IO disk utilization on db volume
>
> ===>29237 2016-03-02 15:17:23 EET 0 [24-1]LOG:
Hi
2016-03-02 16:25 GMT+01:00 Artem Tomyuk :
> Hi.
>
> I've noticed that autovac. process worked more than 10 minutes, during
> this zabbix logged more than 90% IO disk utilization on db volume
>
> ===>29237 2016-03-02 15:17:23 EET 0 [24-1]LOG: automatic
Hi.
I've noticed that autovac. process worked more than 10 minutes, during this
zabbix logged more than 90% IO disk utilization on db volume
===>29237 2016-03-02 15:17:23 EET 0 [24-1]LOG:
automatic vacuum of table "lb_upr.public._reference32": index scans: 1
pages: 0