Glyn Astill wrote:
Any of you chaps used this controller?
It looks very similar to the rebadged Adaptec that Sun shipped in the
X4150 I ordered a few weeks ago, though the Sun model had only 256MB of
cache RAM. I was wary of going Adaptec after my experiences with the
PERC/3i, which
Glyn Astill wrote:
Bonie++ benchmarks below.
I believe the the Perc 5/i Raid 10 mode is actually a span of mirrors, rather
than the expected stripe of mirrors we should expect from 1+0, and that this is
the reason for the shitty performance.
Could you build three RAID-1 mirrors on the
Mikael Carneholm wrote:
I would be interested in what numbers you would get out of bonnie++
(http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++) and BenchmarkSQL
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/benchmarksql) on that hardware, for
comparison with our DL385 (2xOpteron 280, 16Gb ram) and MSA1500. If you
need help
Alex Turner wrote:
Anyone who has tried x86-64 linux knows what a royal pain in the ass it
is. They didn't do anything sensible, like just make the whole OS 64
bit, no, they had to split it up, and put 64-bit libs in a new directory
/lib64. This means that a great many applications don't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another benefit of Pentium D over AMD X2, at least until AMD chooses
to switch, is that Pentium D supports DDR2, whereas AMD only supports
DDR. There are a lot of technical pros and cons to each - with claims
from AMD that DDR2 can be slower than DDR - but one claim that
Miguel wrote:
Excuse me for this off topic, but i notice that you are very excited
about the sun's hardware, what os do you install on them , slowlaris?,
has that os improved in some espectacular way that i should take a look
again?, i used it until solaris 9 and the performance was
Luke Lonergan wrote:
Juan,
On 4/5/06 5:33 PM, Juan Casero (FL FLC) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
... but I am looking to see if the performance
benefit we can get from this server is worth the price tag right now.
While many people here will look forward to performance results on the
T2000, I
Luke Lonergan wrote:
Leigh,
On 4/5/06 9:23 PM, Leigh Dyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've got a Sun Fire V40z and it's quite a nice machine -- 6x 15krpm
drives, 4GB RAM, and a pair of Opteron 850s. This gives us more than
enough power now for what we need, but it's nice to know that we can
Steve Wampler wrote:
Is the performance behavior that we're experiencing a known
problem with 7.2 that has been addressed in 7.4? Or will the
upgrade fix other problems while leaving this one?
I'm pretty sure that in versions earlier than 7.4, IN clauses that use a
subquery will always use
