Re: [PERFORM] Compile Vs RPMs

2004-02-04 Thread scott.marlowe
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Christopher Browne wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Anjan Dave") writes: > > I would like to know whether there are any significant performance > > advantages of compiling (say, 7.4) on your platform (being RH7.3, 8, > > and 9.0, and Fedora especially) versus getting the relevant b

Re: [PERFORM] Compile Vs RPMs

2004-02-03 Thread Christopher Browne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Anjan Dave") writes: > I would like to know whether there are any significant performance > advantages of compiling (say, 7.4) on your platform (being RH7.3, 8, > and 9.0, and Fedora especially) versus getting the relevant binaries > (rpm) from the postgresql site? Hardware is I

Re: [PERFORM] Compile Vs RPMs

2004-02-03 Thread Paul Thomas
On 03/02/2004 20:58 Anjan Dave wrote: Hello, I would like to know whether there are any significant performance advantages of compiling (say, 7.4) on your platform (being RH7.3, 8, and 9.0, and Fedora especially) versus getting the relevant binaries (rpm) from the postgresql site? Hardware is Inte

Re: [PERFORM] Compile Vs RPMs

2004-02-03 Thread Bill Moran
Anjan Dave wrote: Hello, I would like to know whether there are any significant performance advantages of compiling (say, 7.4) on your platform (being RH7.3, 8, and 9.0, and Fedora especially) versus getting the relevant binaries (rpm) from the postgresql site? Hardware is Intel XEON (various

[PERFORM] Compile Vs RPMs

2004-02-03 Thread Anjan Dave
Title: Message Hello,   I would like to know whether there are any significant performance advantages of compiling (say, 7.4) on your platform (being RH7.3, 8, and 9.0, and Fedora especially) versus getting the relevant binaries (rpm) from the postgresql site? Hardware is Intel XEON (various