Thanks for the feedback guys. I'm looking forward to the day when we
upgrade to SSDs.
For future reference, the bonnie++ numbers I was referring to are:
Size: 63G
Sequential Output:
396505 K/sec
% CPU 21
Sequential Input:
401117 K/sec
% CPU 21
I'm pretty new to benchmarking hard disks and I'm looking for some advice
on interpreting the results of some basic tests.
The server is:
- Dell PowerEdge R430
- 1 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 2.4GHz
- 32 GB RAM
- 4 x 600GB 10k SAS Seagate ST600MM0088 in RAID 10
- PERC H730P Raid Controller with 2GB cache
question, feel free to clarify for me.
Mike
From: pgsql-performance-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Dave Stibrany
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 1:45 PM
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: [PERFORM] Disk Benchmarking Question
I&#
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> Given the size of your bonnie test set and the fact that you're using
> RAID-10, the cache should make little or no difference. The RAID
> controller may or may not interleave reads between all four drives.
> Some do, some don't. It looks to
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Dave Stibrany wrote:
> I'm pretty new to benchmarking hard disks and I'm looking for some advice on
> interpreting the results of some basic tests.
>
> The server is:
> - Dell PowerEdge R430
> - 1 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 2.4GHz
> - 32 GB RAM
> - 4 x 600GB 10k SAS Seag
me.
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* pgsql-performance-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:
> pgsql-performance-ow...@postgresql.org] *On Behalf Of *Dave Stibrany
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 17, 2016 1:45 PM
> *To:* pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
> *Subject:* [PERFORM] Disk Benc
mailto:pgsql-performance-ow...@postgresql.org> ] On Behalf Of Dave Stibrany
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 1:45 PM
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <mailto:pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: [PERFORM] Disk Benchmarking Question
I'm pretty new to benchmarking hard disks and
