On Tuesday 25 November 2003 18:42, shane hill wrote:
>
> Our db is getting to be a respectable size (about 10GB right now) and is
> growing slower and slower. I have been charged with making it faster and
> with a smaller footprint while retaining all of the current
> functionality. here is one of
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:42:47 -0800
shane hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our db is getting to be a respectable size (about 10GB right now) and
> is growing slower and slower. I have been charged with making it
> faster and with a smaller footprint while retaining all of the current
> functionali
Shane,
> Disclaimer: I am relatively new to RDBMSs, so please do not laugh at me
> too loudly, you can laugh, just not too loudly and please do not point. :)
Hey, we all started somewhere. Nobody was born knowing databases. Except
maybe Neil Conway.
> I am working on an Automated Installer
[small chuckle]
By George, I think he's got it!
You are on the right track. Have a look at this link on database
normalization for more info:
http://databases.about.com/library/weekly/aa080501a.htm
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 10:42, shane hill wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Disclaimer: I am relatively n
Hi folks,
Disclaimer: I am relatively new to RDBMSs, so please do not laugh at me
too loudly, you can laugh, just not too loudly and please do not point. :)
I am working on an Automated Installer Testing System for Adobe Systems
and I am doing a DB redesign of the current postgres db:
1. We
