On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> i have sql file (it's size are 1GB )
>> when i execute it then the String is 987098801 bytr too long for encoding
>> conversion error occured .
>> pls give me solution about
>
> You hit the upper limit of internal memory allocation limit in
> i have sql file (it's size are 1GB )
> when i execute it then the String is 987098801 bytr too long for encoding
> conversion error occured .
> pls give me solution about
You hit the upper limit of internal memory allocation limit in
PostgreSQL. IMO, there's no way to avoid the error except yo
hi
i have sql file (it's size are 1GB )
when i execute it then the String is 987098801 bytr too long for encoding
conversion error occured .
pls give me solution about
i have XP 64-bit with 8 GB RAM shared_buffer 1GB check point = 34
with thanks
mahavir
gt; Subject: [PERFORM] out of memory problem
> To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
> Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2010, 5:39 AM
> Hello together,
>
> I get an out of memory problem I don't understand.
> The installed Postgres-Version is:
> PostgreSQL 8.3.7 on i486-pc-linu
Till Kirchner writes:
> I get an out of memory problem I don't understand.
It's pretty clear that something is leaking memory in the per-query
context:
>ExecutorState: 1833967692 total in 230 blocks; 9008 free (3
> chunks); 1833958684 used
There doesn't seem to be anything in your quer
Hello together,
I get an out of memory problem I don't understand.
The installed Postgres-Version is:
PostgreSQL 8.3.7 on i486-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc-4.3.real
(Debian 4.3.3-5) 4.3.3
It is running on a 32bit Debian machine with 4GB RAM.
Thanks for any help in advance
Till
--
--
Hello
I think this SQL returns the following error.
ERROR: missing FROM-clause entry for table "email_track"
LINE 3: email_track.count AS "Emails_Access_Count",
^
For a fact ,this SQL does not have the "email_trac" table in from-clause.
1)Is this SQL right?
2)If the SQL is right, ca
Can you provide these details
work_mem
How much physical memory there is on your system
Most out of memory errors are associated with a high work_mem setting
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 6:25 AM, AI Rumman wrote:
> Whenever I run this query, I get out of memory error:
>
>
> explain analyze
> select
Whenever I run this query, I get out of memory error:
explain analyze
*select *
email_track.count AS "Emails_Access_Count",
activity.subject AS "Emails_Subject",
crmentity.crmid AS EntityId_crmentitycrmid
*from *
(select * from crmentity where deleted = 0 and createdtime between (now() -
interval
On Jun 29, 2008, at 10:20 PM, Nimesh Satam wrote:
All,
While running a Select query we get the below error:
ERROR: out of memory
DETAIL: Failed on request of size 192.
Postgres Conf details:
shared_buffers = 256000
work_mem =15
max_stack_depth = 16384
max_fsm_pages = 40
version: 8
All,
While running a Select query we get the below error:
ERROR: out of memory
DETAIL: Failed on request of size 192.
Postgres Conf details:
shared_buffers = 256000
work_mem =15
max_stack_depth = 16384
max_fsm_pages = 40
version: 8.1.3
We are using 8gb of Primary memory for the server
Hello Everyone,
I'm trying to find out/understand what causes my 'out of memory' error.
I do not have enough experience with such logs to understand what is
wrong or how to fix it. So i hope someone can point me in the right
direction.
The 'rpt.rpt_verrichting' table contains about 8.5 milli
Good morning,
I've increased sort_mem until 2Go !!
and the error "out of memory" appears again.
Here the request I try to pass with her explain plan,
Nested Loop (cost=2451676.23..2454714.73 rows=1001 width=34)
-> Subquery Scan "day" (cost=2451676.23..2451688.73 rows=1000 width=16)
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 11:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here the result with hashAgg to false :
> Nested Loop (cost=2487858.08..2490896.58 rows=1001 width=34) (actual
> time=1028044.781..1030251.260 rows=1000 loops=1)
>-> Subquery Scan "day" (cost=2487858.08..2487870.58 rows=1000 width=16)
Here the result with hashAgg to false :
Nested Loop (cost=2487858.08..2490896.58 rows=1001 width=34) (actual
time=1028044.781..1030251.260 rows=1000 loops=1)
-> Subquery Scan "day" (cost=2487858.08..2487870.58 rows=1000 width=16)
(actual time=1027996.748..1028000.969 rows=1000 loops=1)
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 09:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Good morning,
>
>
>
>
> I've increased sort_mem until 2Go !!
> and the error "out of memory" appears again.
>
> Here the request I try to pass with her explain plan,
>
> Nested Loop (cost=2451676.23..2454714.73 rows=1001 width=34)
>
You're right, release is 7.4.7.
there's twenty millions records "query"
> On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 11:36, Tom Lane wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > Yes, I've launched ANALYZE command before sending request.
> > > I precise that's postgres version is 7.3.4
> >
> > Can't possibly be 7.3.4, t
Good morning,
I've increased sort_mem until 2Go !!
and the error "out of memory" appears again.
Here the request I try to pass with her explain plan,
Nested Loop (cost=2451676.23..2454714.73 rows=1001 width=34)
-> Subquery Scan "day" (cost=2451676.23..2451688.73 rows=1000 width=16)
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 11:36, Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Yes, I've launched ANALYZE command before sending request.
> > I precise that's postgres version is 7.3.4
>
> Can't possibly be 7.3.4, that version didn't have HashAggregate.
>
> How many distinct values of "query" actua
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Yes, I've launched ANALYZE command before sending request.
> I precise that's postgres version is 7.3.4
Can't possibly be 7.3.4, that version didn't have HashAggregate.
How many distinct values of "query" actually exist in the table?
regards, t
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 10:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> command explain analyze crash with the "out of memory" error
>
> I precise that I've tried a lot of values from parameters shared_buffer and
> sort_mem
>
> now, in config file, values are :
> sort_mem=32768
> and shared_buffer=3
OK, on
command explain analyze crash with the "out of memory" error
I precise that I've tried a lot of values from parameters shared_buffer and
sort_mem
now, in config file, values are :
sort_mem=32768
and shared_buffer=3
server has 4Go RAM.
and kernel.shmmax=30720
> On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 10
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 10:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, I've launched ANALYZE command before sending request.
> I precise that's postgres version is 7.3.4
So what does explain analyze show for this query, if anything? Can you
increase your sort_mem or shared_buffers (I forget which hash_agg
Yes, I've launched ANALYZE command before sending request.
I precise that's postgres version is 7.3.4
> On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 10:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Thanks for your response,
>
> SNIP
>
> > if HashAgg operation ran out of memory, what can i do ?
>
> 1: Don't top post.
>
> 2: Have you
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 10:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks for your response,
SNIP
> if HashAgg operation ran out of memory, what can i do ?
1: Don't top post.
2: Have you run analyze? Normally when hash agg runs out of memory, the
planner THOUGHT the hash agg would fit in memory, but it wa
Thanks for your response,
I've made this request :
SELECT query_string, DAY.ocu from search_data.query_string,
(SELECT SUM(occurence) as ocu, query
FROM daily.queries_detail_statistics
WHERE date >= '2006-01-01' AND date <= '2006-01-30'
AND portal IN (1,2)
GROUP BY query
ORDER BY ocu DESC
L
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I've error "out of memory" with these traces :
Doing what?
> AggContext: -1976573952 total in 287 blocks; 25024 free (414 chunks);
> -1976598976 used
> DynaHashTable: 503439384 total in 70 blocks; 6804760 free (257 chunks);
> 496634624 used
I'd guess that a HashAgg op
Hello,
I've error "out of memory" with these traces :
TopMemoryContext: 32768 total in 3 blocks; 5152 free (1 chunks); 27616 used
TopTransactionContext: 8192 total in 1 blocks; 8136 free (0 chunks); 56 used
DeferredTriggerXact: 0 total in 0 blocks; 0 free (0 chunks); 0 used
MessageContext: 24576
28 matches
Mail list logo
