On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
With the new warning about too-frequent checkpoints, people have actual
feedback to encourage them to increase checkpoint_segments. One issue
is that it is likely to recommend increasing checkpoint_segments during
restore, even if there is no value
RT == Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RT hmm... i wonder what would happen if you pushed your sort_mem higher...
RT on some of our development boxes and upgrade scripts, i push the
RT sort_mem to 102400 and sometimes even higher depending on the box. this
RT really speeds up my restores
Vivek Khera wrote:
And the winner is... checkpoint_segments.
Restore of a significanly big database (~19.8GB restored) shows nearly
no time difference depending on sort_mem when checkpoint_segments is
large. There are quite a number of tables and indexes. The restore
was done from a
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 15:15, Vivek Khera wrote:
And the winner is... checkpoint_segments.
Restore of a significanly big database (~19.8GB restored) shows nearly
no time difference depending on sort_mem when checkpoint_segments is
large. There are quite a number of tables and indexes. The
RT == Robert Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RT hmm... i wonder what would happen if you pushed your sort_mem higher...
RT on some of our development boxes and upgrade scripts, i push the
RT sort_mem to 102400 and sometimes even higher depending on the box. this
RT really speeds up my restores
TL == Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TL I was just bugging Marc for some useful data, so I'll ask you too:
TL could you provide a trace of the pg_restore execution? log_statement
TL plus log_duration output would do it. I am curious to understand
TL exactly which steps in the restore are
Vivek,
And the winner is... checkpoint_segments.
Restore of a significanly big database (~19.8GB restored) shows nearly
no time difference depending on sort_mem when checkpoint_segments is
large. There are quite a number of tables and indexes. The restore
was done from a pg_dump -Fc dump
Vivek Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Restore of a significanly big database (~19.8GB restored) shows nearly
no time difference depending on sort_mem when checkpoint_segments is
large. There are quite a number of tables and indexes. The restore
was done from a pg_dump -Fc dump of one
