On 11/26/07, Damon Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, what's different between these tests? I'm seeing performance
differences of between +65% to +90% transactions per second of the
OpenVZ kernel running on the HN over the stock Fedora 8 kernel. Is
this reflective of different emphasis between
On Nov 26, 2007 4:50 PM, Damon Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, what's different between these tests? I'm seeing performance
differences of between +65% to +90% transactions per second of the
OpenVZ kernel running on the HN over the stock Fedora 8 kernel. Is
this reflective of different
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 17:00 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007 4:50 PM, Damon Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, what's different between these tests? I'm seeing performance
differences of between +65% to +90% transactions per second of the
OpenVZ kernel running on the HN over the
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 18:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Damon Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, what's different between these tests? I'm seeing performance
differences of between +65% to +90% transactions per second of the
OpenVZ kernel running on the HN over the stock Fedora 8 kernel. Is
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Damon Hart wrote:
Fedora 8:
Linux 2.6.23.1-49.fc8 #1 SMP Thu Nov 8 21:41:26 EST 2007 i686 i686 i386
GNU/Linux
OpenVZ:
Linux 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5.028stab049.1 #1 SMP Thu Nov 8 16:23:12 MSK 2007
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
2.6.23 introduced a whole new scheduler: