On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:54:52PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
...
A vacuum verbose could give you a good indication if you need to reindex,
compare the # of pages in the index with the # in the table.
Hmmm, I have a feeling that's not as obvious as I thought... I can't
identify the index
Steve Wampler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmmm, I have a feeling that's not as obvious as I thought... I can't
identify the index (named 'id_index') in the output of vacuum verbose.
In 7.2, the index reports look like
Index %s: Pages %u; Tuples %.0f.
and should appear in the part of the
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 16:38, Neil Conway wrote:
(1) Can you confirm that the VACUUM FULL on site B actually
removed all the tuples you intended it to remove? Concurrent
transactions can limit the amount of data that VACUUM FULL is
able to reclaim. If you run
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Vivek Khera wrote:
MTO == Matthew T O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then it just sits there. I started it at 11:35am, and it is now
3:30pm.
MTO Weird Alphabetically speaking, is vkmlm.public.user_list
be the
MTO last table in the last schema in the last
