On Thu, 21 May 2009, Scott Marlowe wrote:
But in a RAID-10 you aggreate pairs like RAID-0, so you could write
250(n/2) times per second on 15k where n=4 and 166(n/2) for 10k drives
where n=8. So 500 versus 664... ? Or am I getting it wrong.
Adding more spindles doesn't improve the fact that
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Robert Schnabel wrote:
A word of warning for anyone out there considering the Seagate 1.5TB
SATA drives (ST31500341AS)...I'm going through a fiasco right now with
these drives and I wish I had purchased more when I did.
Those drives are involved in the worst firmware deba
Thanks for all the suggestions i will go with 8 10k disks, well 9 if you count
the spare now that i am scared :)
Regards,
Miguel Angel.
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-pe
Greg Smith wrote:
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Robert Schnabel wrote:
A word of warning for anyone out there considering the Seagate 1.5TB
SATA drives (ST31500341AS)...I'm going through a fiasco right now
with these drives and I wish I had purchased more when I did.
I don't think you came to the right
On Fri, 22 May 2009, Robert Schnabel wrote:
No, the original drives I have work fine. The problem, as you point out, is
that Seagate changed the firmware and made it so that you cannot flash it to
a different version.
The subtle point here is that whether a drive has been out long enough to
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 22 May 2009, Robert Schnabel wrote:
>
>> No, the original drives I have work fine. The problem, as you point out,
>> is that Seagate changed the firmware and made it so that you cannot flash it
>> to a different version.
>
> The subtle
On Fri, 22 May 2009, Scott Marlowe wrote:
It's much less common to see such a change in server class drives
This is a good point, and I just updated
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SCSI_vs._IDE/SATA_Disks with a section
about this topic (the last one under "ATA Disks").
--
* Greg Smith gsm
Greg Smith wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2009, Scott Marlowe wrote:
It's much less common to see such a change in server class drives
This is a good point, and I just updated
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SCSI_vs._IDE/SATA_Disks with a section
about this topic (the last one under "ATA Disks").
An
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Blewett writes:
> > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Thanks. Could I trouble you for one other data point --- about how many
> >> rows are in each of these tables?
>
> > Not a problem:
>
> As best I can tell, the sel
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Frank Joerdens wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Frank Joerdens wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> [...]
>>> You could try changing _IOLBF
>>> to _IOFBF near the head of postmaster/syslogger.c and see if that helps.
>
> The patc
10 matches
Mail list logo
