Jack Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Theories at this point, in no particular order:
> a) major differences between my 7.3.4 from source (compiled with no
> options) and dev's 7.3.2-1PGDG RPMs. Looking at the spec file doesn't
> reveal anything glaring to me, but is there something I'm missin
> "MTO" == Matthew T O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MTO> Yeah, FreeBSD testing would have been nice, but I don't have access to
MTO> any FreeBSD boxes so.
FWIW, with the fflush() added after that sleep, and the fix to the
long long computation of sleep time to keep it from overflowi
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 17:22, Jack Coates wrote:
...
> That's it, I'm throwing out this whole test series and starting over
> with different hardware. Database server is now a dual 2GHz Xeon with
> 2GB RAM & 2940UW SCSI, OS and PG's logs on 36G drive, PG data on 9GB
> drive. Data is importing now an
Steve Wampler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks, Tom. Are there any reasons why it would not appear?:
Oh, I shoulda read the code more carefully. I was looking at the bottom
of lazy_scan_index, where the printout is done, and failed to notice the
test at the top:
/*
* If the index i
On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 09:52, Tom Lane wrote:
> Steve Wampler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hmmm, I have a feeling that's not as obvious as I thought... I can't
> > identify the index (named 'id_index') in the output of vacuum verbose.
>
> In 7.2, the index reports look like
> Index %s: Pa
