Are you running a lot of full table updates?
If you mean updates which are applied on every or almost every row of
the table - yes, it happens with two rather small tables of max. 10
000 rows. But they are both not touched by the query with this big
performance difference.
I'm not an expert, but
Hello,
the following query seems to take ages to get executed. However I am
more than sure (as you can see from the explain analyse) that uses all
the correct indexes. In general I have serious issues with joins in my
database. This is a Postgres ver. 9.0 running postgis with the
_int.sql
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Ioannis Anagnostopoulos
ioan...@anatec.com wrote:
- Nested Loop (cost=0.00..20942.93 rows=53 width=144) (actual
time=62.174..17783236.718 rows=387105 loops=1)
Join Filter: (feed_all_y2012m07.message_copies.msg_id =
On 20/07/2012 22:23, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Ioannis Anagnostopoulos
ioan...@anatec.com wrote:
- Nested Loop (cost=0.00..20942.93 rows=53 width=144) (actual
time=62.174..17783236.718 rows=387105 loops=1)
Join Filter:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Ioannis Anagnostopoulos
ioan...@anatec.com wrote:
On 20/07/2012 22:23, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Ioannis Anagnostopoulos
ioan...@anatec.com wrote:
- Nested Loop (cost=0.00..20942.93 rows=53 width=144) (actual
On 20/07/2012 22:33, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Ioannis Anagnostopoulos
ioan...@anatec.com wrote:
On 20/07/2012 22:23, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Ioannis Anagnostopoulos
ioan...@anatec.com wrote:
- Nested Loop
On 20/07/2012 22:33, Rosser Schwarz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Ioannis Anagnostopoulos
ioan...@anatec.com wrote:
On 20/07/2012 22:23, Claudio Freire wrote:
Misestimated row counts... did you try running an analyze, or upping
statistic targets?
I have run analyse every so often. I
On 20/07/2012 22:53, Ioannis Anagnostopoulos wrote:
On 20/07/2012 22:33, Rosser Schwarz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Ioannis Anagnostopoulos
ioan...@anatec.com wrote:
On 20/07/2012 22:23, Claudio Freire wrote:
Misestimated row counts... did you try running an analyze, or upping
Claudio Freire klaussfre...@gmail.com writes:
Looking at this:
- Index Scan using
idx_message_copies_wk2_date_src_pos_partial on message_copies_wk2
message_copies (cost=0.00..19057.93 rows=52 width=32) (actual
time=62.124..5486270.845 rows=387524 loops=1)
On 21/07/2012 00:10, Tom Lane wrote:
Claudio Freire klaussfre...@gmail.com writes:
Looking at this:
- Index Scan using
idx_message_copies_wk2_date_src_pos_partial on message_copies_wk2
message_copies (cost=0.00..19057.93 rows=52 width=32) (actual
time=62.124..5486270.845
10 matches
Mail list logo
