Tom Lane wrote:
Greg Spiegelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I turned syslog back on and the restore slowed down again. Turned
it off and it sped right back up.
We have heard reports before of syslog being quite slow. What platform
are you on exactly? Does Richard's suggestion of turning off
Gary Doades wrote:
Has anyone else done any comparative testing with the 2.6 kernel?
I know for a fact that certain stuff is recognized differently between
2.2, 2.4 and 2.6 kernels.
For example i have one box that i installed debian stable on that used a
2.2 kernel which automatically tuned on
Tom Lane wrote:
Hmmm ... I've been able to reproduce the CS storm on a dual Athlon,
which seems to pretty much let the Xeon per se off the hook. Anybody
got a multiple Opteron to try? Totally non-Intel CPUs?
It would be interesting to see results with non-Linux kernels, too.
regards, tom lane
Stef wrote:
Christopher Kings-Lynne mentioned :
=> sort_mem = 4096
Reducing sort_mem to 4096 seems to make it run in a reasonable time
again. Any idea why? The database does a whole lot of huge sorts
every day, so I thought upping this parameter would help.
A couple of queries do seem to run slower
