Grzegorz Jaskiewicz wrote:
acording to kernel folks, anticipatory scheduler is even better for dbs.
Oh well, it probably means everyone has to test it on their own at the
end of day.
In my test case, noop and deadline performed well, deadline being a little
better than noop.
Both anticipatory
Craig James wrote:
This data is good enough for what I'm doing. There were
reports from non-RAID users that the I/O scheduling could
make as much as a 4x difference in performance (which makes
sense for non-RAID), but these tests show me that three of
the four I/O schedulers are within
