Jason,
> In terms of numbers, we expect have an average of 100 active connections
> (most of which are idle 9/10ths of the time), with about 85% reading
> traffic. I hope to have one server host about 1000-2000 active databases,
> with the largest being about 60 meg (no blobs). Inactive databases
> "JH" == Jason Hihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JH> The configuration that is going on in my head is:
JH> RAID 1, 200gig disks
JH> 1 server, 4g ram
JH> Linux 2.4 or 2.6 (depends on when we deploy and 2.6's track record at that
JH> time)
My recommendation is to get more disks (smaller and fas
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Jason Hihn wrote:
> Ok, I asked this on [novice], but I was told it's be better to post it
> here...
>
> I've got some money to spend on a new servers. The biggest concern is the
> PostgreSQL database server that will "be the company." (*Everyone* uses the
> database server in
Ok, I asked this on [novice], but I was told it's be better to post it
here...
I've got some money to spend on a new servers. The biggest concern is the
PostgreSQL database server that will "be the company." (*Everyone* uses the
database server in some form or another) I'm looking for hot-swappabl
