>>>-Messaggio originale-
>>>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di
>>>Christopher Kings-Lynne
>>>Inviato: venerdì 14 maggio 2004 11.55
>>>A: Fabio Panizzutti
>>>Cc: 'Manfred Koizar';
> I trust in my hardware an O.S so fsync setting is a
> big dubt for my production enviroment .
Then you are making a big mistake, loving your hardware more than your
data...
Chris
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archiv
Index Scan using pk_storico_misure_2 on storico_misure
(cost=0.00..1984.64 rows=658 width=21) (actual
>>>time=723.441..1858.107
rows=835 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((data_tag > '2004-05-03
>>>00:00:00'::timestamp without
time zone) AND (data_tag < '2004-05-12 00:00:00'::tim
>>>-Messaggio originale-
>>>Da: Stephan Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Inviato: giovedì 13 maggio 2004 17.17
>>>A: Fabio Panizzutti
>>>Cc: 'Shridhar Daithankar'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Oggetto: Re: R: [PERFORM] Query plan on identical tables
>>>differs . Why ?
>>>
>>>
>>>On Thu, 13 Ma
>>>-Messaggio originale-
>>>Da: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Inviato: giovedì 13 maggio 2004 17.01
>>>A: Fabio Panizzutti
>>>Cc: 'Shridhar Daithankar'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Oggetto: Re: R: [PERFORM] Query plan on identical tables
>>>differs . Why ?
>>>
>>>
>>>"Fabio Panizzutti