R: R: R: [PERFORM] Query plan on identical tables differs . Why ?

2004-05-14 Thread Fabio Panizzutti
>>>-Messaggio originale- >>>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di >>>Christopher Kings-Lynne >>>Inviato: venerdì 14 maggio 2004 11.55 >>>A: Fabio Panizzutti >>>Cc: 'Manfred Koizar';

Re: R: R: [PERFORM] Query plan on identical tables differs . Why ?

2004-05-14 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
> I trust in my hardware an O.S so fsync setting is a > big dubt for my production enviroment . Then you are making a big mistake, loving your hardware more than your data... Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archiv

R: R: [PERFORM] Query plan on identical tables differs . Why ?

2004-05-14 Thread Fabio Panizzutti
Index Scan using pk_storico_misure_2 on storico_misure (cost=0.00..1984.64 rows=658 width=21) (actual >>>time=723.441..1858.107 rows=835 loops=1) Index Cond: ((data_tag > '2004-05-03 >>>00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (data_tag < '2004-05-12 00:00:00'::tim

R: R: [PERFORM] Query plan on identical tables differs . Why ?

2004-05-14 Thread Fabio Panizzutti
>>>-Messaggio originale- >>>Da: Stephan Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Inviato: giovedì 13 maggio 2004 17.17 >>>A: Fabio Panizzutti >>>Cc: 'Shridhar Daithankar'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Oggetto: Re: R: [PERFORM] Query plan on identical tables >>>differs . Why ? >>> >>> >>>On Thu, 13 Ma

R: R: [PERFORM] Query plan on identical tables differs . Why ?

2004-05-14 Thread Fabio Panizzutti
>>>-Messaggio originale- >>>Da: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Inviato: giovedì 13 maggio 2004 17.01 >>>A: Fabio Panizzutti >>>Cc: 'Shridhar Daithankar'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Oggetto: Re: R: [PERFORM] Query plan on identical tables >>>differs . Why ? >>> >>> >>>"Fabio Panizzutti