On Monday 14 July 2003 01:21, Balazs Wellisch wrote:
Unfortunatelly, compiling from source is not really an option for us. We
use RPMs only to ease the installation and upgrade process. We have over a
hundred servers to maintaine and having to compile and recompile software
everytime a new
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 11:25:14AM -0700, Nikolaus Dilger wrote:
Alexandre,
Since you want the fastest speed I would do the 2 data
disks in RAID 0 (striping) not RAID 1 (mirroring).
Note that RAID 0 buys you nothing at all in redundancy. So if the
point is to be able to recover from a disk
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 12:42:29PM -0700, Balazs Wellisch wrote:
On Sun, 2003-07-13 at 01:35, Balazs Wellisch wrote:
Note that I've read a couple of times from Tom Lane (one of the
core team) that FKs are a serous performance drag, so I'd drop
them after the s/w has been in production
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 12:51:02PM -0700, Balazs Wellisch wrote:
Unfortunatelly, compiling from source is not really an option for us. We use
RPMs only to ease the installation and upgrade process. We have over a
hundred servers to maintaine and having to compile and recompile software
On Sun, 2003-07-13 at 14:50, Steve Wampler wrote:
I've got a simple nested query:
select * from attributes where id in (select id from
attributes where (name='obsid') and (value='oid00066'));
that performs abysmally. I've heard this described as the
'classic WHERE IN' problem.
On 13/07/2003 20:51 Balazs Wellisch wrote:
[snip]
So, does anyone here have any experience using RH AS and DB 2.1?
Are RH still selling DB 2.1? I can't find it listed on their web site.
--
Yes, it's available for free download. The documentation is here:
On Monday 14 Jul 2003 3:31 pm, Stephen Howie wrote:
[snip]
My problem is that I have not totally put my head around the concepts of
the shmmax, shmmaxpgs, etc As it pertains to my current setup and the
shared mem values in postgresql.conf. I'm looking for a good rule of thumb
when
Greetings,
We have several tables (in a PG 7.3.3 database on RH Linux 7.3) with 2M+
rows (each row 300-400 bytes in length) that we SELECT into a JDBC
ResultSet for display to the user. We expected that the driver would not
actually transmit data from the database until the application began
Richard-
That was very helpfull Thanks!
I still would like some guidance on tunning FreeBSD (shmmax and shmmaxpgs).
Do I need to even touch these settings?
Stephen Howie
There are two articles recently posted here:
http://www.varlena.com/GeneralBits/
They should provide a good start.
--
Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, it looks to me like the subquery-scan-outside plan probably
is the faster one, on both my machine and yours. I get
Woah, that's pretty whacky. It seems like it ought to be way faster to do a
single sequential
10 matches
Mail list logo
