Hi to all! I have the following query. The execution time is very big, it
doesn't use the indexes and I don't understand why...
SELECT count(o.id) FROM orders o
INNER JOIN report r ON o.id=r.id_order
INNER JOIN status s ON o
Hi to
all,
I have a query which counts how many elements I have in the
database.
SELECT count(o.id) FROM orders
o INNER JOIN report r ON
o.id=r.id_order INNER JOIN status s ON
o.id_status=s.id INNER JOIN contact c ON
o.id_ag=c.id INNER JOIN endkunde e ON
o.id_endk
299 width=4) (actual
time=101.257..101.257 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on endkunde e (cost=0.00..1245.99 rows=44299
width=4) (actual time=0.050..59.641 rows=44301 loops=1)
Total runtime: 3033.230 ms
Thanks for help.
Andy.
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PRO
Hi to all, I have the following 2 examples. Now,
regarding on the offset if it is small(10) or big(>5) what is the impact
on the performance of the query?? I noticed that if I return more
data's(columns) or if I make more joins then the query runs even
slower if the OFFSET is bigger. Ho
If you're using this to provide "pages" of results, could you use a
cursor?
What do you mean by that? Cursor?
Yes I'm using this to provide "pages", but If I jump to the last pages it
goes very slow.
Andy.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Huxt
DIGGING for solutions.
Andy.
- Original Message -
From: "Ragnar Hafstað" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: "Andrei Bintintan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 9:23 PM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] [SQL] OFFSET impact on Performance???
On Thu, 2005-01-
gards,
Andy.
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Richard Huxton" ; "Andrei Bintintan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ;
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] [SQL] OFFSET imp
Andy.
- Original Message -
From: "Stephan Szabo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrei Bintintan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Index not used. WHY?
>
&g
