Hi everyone,
I host a Postgresql server on Ubuntu 12.04 and I am facing server
load spikes (if I run top, it goes up to 25-30 on a 4-core system)...
In some cases, I have to restart potgresql service because users call us
complaining of the slowness, but in some cases I can leave things on
ce, so I'm quite a bit of novice in being a
DBA (but a novice that when needed reads a lot of documentation :-) )
So, if some questions may sound "strange", "noobish" to you, that's the
reason.
On 2/11/16 12:06 PM, Moreno Andreo wrote:
Now, the actual question, is:
Ha
Hi everyone,
I have a question that I hope fits in this discussion group.
I'm migrating my actual server into a new, more powerful architecture on
Google Cloud Platform.
ATM the server is a VM with 4 vCPUs (the host has 4 Xeon E2xx 3,1 GHZ,
if I remember) and 32 GB RAM, just running Ubuntu
Il 23/03/2016 13:29, Mike Sofen ha scritto:
-Original Message-
Thomas Kellerer Wednesday, March 23, 2016 2:51 AM
Jim Nasby schrieb am 11.03.2016 um 17:37:
If the blob is in the database then you have nothing extra to do. It's handled
just like all your other data.
If it's a file in a
Il 23/03/2016 10:50, Thomas Kellerer ha scritto:
Jim Nasby schrieb am 11.03.2016 um 17:37:
If the blob is in the database then you have nothing extra to do. It's handled
just like all your other data.
If it's a file in a file system then you need to:
- Have application code that knows how
Il 23/03/2016 19:51, Jim Nasby ha scritto:
On 3/23/16 4:14 AM, Moreno Andreo wrote:
The main goal is to be *quick*. A doctor with a patient on the other
side of his desk does not want to wait, say, 30 seconds for a clinical
record to open.
Let me explain what is the main problem (actually
Il 02/03/2016 19:40, Alvaro Herrera ha scritto:
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Moreno Andreo <moreno.and...@evolu-s.it> wrote:
... or maybe add some more RAM to have more disk caching (if you're on
*nix) this worked for me in the past... even if IMHO it'
Il 02/03/2016 16:49, Scott Marlowe ha scritto:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Artem Tomyuk wrote:
Hi.
I've noticed that autovac. process worked more than 10 minutes, during this
zabbix
Il 04/04/2016 15:33, Pavel Stehule ha scritto:
PostgreSQL doesn't contain integrated pooler - so any connection to
Postgres enforces one PostgreSQL proces. A performance benchmarks is
showing maximum performance about 10x cores. With high number of
connections you have to use low size of
Il 04/04/2016 16:54, Artem Tomyuk ha
scritto:
2016-04-04 17:43 GMT+03:00 Moreno
Andreo <moreno.and...@evolu-s.it>:
s there a
way to monitor active connections, or at least to
Il 11/03/2016 17:37, Jim Nasby ha scritto:
On 2/22/16 8:40 AM, Moreno Andreo wrote:
Il 18/02/2016 21:33, Jim Nasby ha scritto:
Depending on your needs, could could use synchronous replication as
part of that setup. You can even do that at a per-transaction level,
so maybe you use sync rep most
Il 07/04/2017 17:56, Rick Otten ha
scritto:
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:29 AM,
David G. Johnston
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 7,
2017 at
Il 07/06/2017 13:33, Dinesh Chandra 12108 ha scritto:
Dear Expert,
Is there any
way to rollback table data in PostgreSQL?
Not knowing anything else about your what you want to do and what
Il 06/09/2017 10:12, Soni M ha scritto:
Let's say I have 10 year data, and commonly used data only the last 1
year. This data is quite big, so each table and index file is divided
into several file in PGDATA/base
May not be relevant to what you asked, but if you want to keep last yeat
14 matches
Mail list logo