Is there a performance difference between the two?
which of the PL is most widely used. One problem i have with the plpgsql
is that the quoting is really a pain.
Christopher Browne wrote:
After takin a swig o' Arrakan spice grog, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex) belched out:
i am thinking about
On 2005-04-17 14:56, Alex wrote:
Is there a performance difference between the two?
As Christopher already pointed out, it depends on what you want to do.
If you're doing some complex string processing, it will be easier (and
in some cases) faster to do in plperl, if you're mainly dealing with
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Alex wrote:
Is there a performance difference between the two?
Hello,
It depends on what you are using it for. My experience is that for some
reason plPGSQL is faster when looping but other than that they should
be very similar.
which of the PL is most widely used. One
After a long battle with technology, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex), an earthling,
wrote:
Christopher Browne wrote:
After takin a swig o' Arrakan spice grog, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex) belched
out:
i am thinking about swiching to plperl as it seems to me much more
flexible and easier to create
Hi,
i am thinking about swiching to plperl as it seems to me much more
flexible and easier to create functions.
what is the recommended PL for postgres? or which one is most widely
used / most popular?
is there a performance difference between plpgsql and plperl ?
porting to other systems is
After takin a swig o' Arrakan spice grog, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex) belched out:
i am thinking about swiching to plperl as it seems to me much more
flexible and easier to create functions.
what is the recommended PL for postgres? or which one is most widely
used / most popular?
is there a
