Re: [PERFORM] interesting benchmarks PG/Firebird Linux/Windows fsync/nofsync

2005-03-20 Thread Qingqing Zhou
"Bruce Momjian" writes > > Yes, we now enable FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH on Win32 for open_sync and I > am about to open a discussion whether this should be the default for > Win32, and whether we should backpatch this to 8.0.X. Just a short msg: Oracle/SQL Server enable it as default in win32 *no m

Re: [PERFORM] interesting benchmarks PG/Firebird Linux/Windows fsync/nofsync

2005-03-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
Chris Mair wrote: > Timings are in msec, note that you cannot directly > compare Windows and Linux Performance, since machines > were different. > > You can, however, compare PG to Firebird, and you > can see the effect of the 3 varied parametert. > > One thing that stands out is how terribly > b

Re: [PERFORM] interesting benchmarks PG/Firebird Linux/Windows fsync/nofsync

2005-03-15 Thread Magnus Hagander
> One thing that stands out is how terribly bad Windows > performed with many small single transactions and fsync=true. > > Appearantly fsync on Windows is a very costly operation. What's the hardware? If you're running on disks with write cache enabled, fsync on windows will write through the