On 4/26/05, Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:16:57PM -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
> > Seq Scan on usage_access (cost=0.00..1183396.40 rows=12713851
> > width=116) (actual time=481796.22..481839.43 rows=3343 loops=1)
>
> That's a gross misestimation -- f
Matthew Nuzum wrote:
I have this query that takes a little over 8 min to run:
select client,max(atime) as atime from usage_access where atime >=
(select atime - '1 hour'::interval from usage_access order by atime
desc limit 1) group by client;
I think it can go a lot faster. Any suggestions on impr
On 4/26/05, Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:16:57PM -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
> > Seq Scan on usage_access (cost=0.00..1183396.40 rows=12713851
> > width=116) (actual time=481796.22..481839.43 rows=3343 loops=1)
>
> That's a gross misestimation -- f
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:16:57PM -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
> Seq Scan on usage_access (cost=0.00..1183396.40 rows=12713851
> width=116) (actual time=481796.22..481839.43 rows=3343 loops=1)
That's a gross misestimation -- four orders of magnitude off!
Have you considering doing this in two s
