On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> None, I fear. The stuff you are fooling with is leftover from the old
> PostQuel language. Most of it is suffering from bit rot, because the
> developers' focus has been on SQL92 compliance for the last six or seven
> years. I hadn't realized that SQL99 h
John Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to figure out what support PostgreSQL offers for SQL99
> abstract data types.
None, I fear. The stuff you are fooling with is leftover from the old
PostQuel language. Most of it is suffering from bit rot, because the
developers' focus has bee
Hi all,
I'm sure this has become somewhat of a FAQ recently, but I couldn't
find any reference to casting composite types in the mailing lists.
I'm trying to figure out what support PostgreSQL offers for SQL99
abstract data types.
PostgreSQL version is cvs from about a week ago.
Given the
Forest Wilkinson wrote:
> I have a database in which five separate tables may (or may not) reference
> any given row in a table of postal addresses. I am using the primary /
> foreign key support in postgres 7 to represent these references.
>
> My problem is that, any time a reference is removed
