1 - why two databases? Couldn't you have just created two separate SCHEMAS?
2 - if you insist on two separate databases:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/dblink.html
From: pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org] On
Behalf Of Kaleeswaran Velu
Sent:
Should match to the data type of the filtered value, so CHAR,VARCHAR,All DATE
TYPES should be quoted. INTEGER, BIGINT, SMALLINT should not
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org] On
Behalf Of Carlos Mennens
Sent: Thursday,
Check out DB Solo ...
http://www.dbsolo.com/
Does both DDL compare as well as data compare.
From: pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org [pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf
Of manuel antonio ochoa [manuel8aalf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011
You may want to try dblink.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/dblink.html
From: pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org] On
Behalf Of Shaun McCloud
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 10:51 AM
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: [SQL] Union Question
This is discussed in this Wiki:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Grouping_Sets
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org] On
Behalf Of Hiltibidal, Rob
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 12:06 PM
To: Oliveiros; Wes James;
I am trying to create a update trigger on a table that basically will only fire
when a specific column is updated. I am using version 8.4.3.
My plan of attack was to always fire on any row update, and pass in the OLD and
NEW column that I want to check.
CREATE TRIGGER check_lockout
AFTER
Nevermind all, I figured it out
Thanks Dmitriy ...
From: Dmitriy Igrishin [mailto:dmit...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 3:25 PM
To: Plugge, Joe R.
Subject: Re: [SQL] Column Specific Update Trigger Routine
Hey Plugge,
You dont need to pass OLD.* or NEW.* to the trigger function
and ownerid = OLD.ownerid;
RETURN NEW;
END IF;
RETURN NULL; -- result is ignored since this is an AFTER trigger
END;
$$;
Thanks !!
From: Justin Graf [mailto:jus...@magwerks.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 3:59 PM
To: Plugge, Joe R.; pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject
Johnf,
I would think that the _p, _test, _r etc are local variables within the
procedure/function and this is the way that the value (from the select) gets
assigned to that local variable.
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org
Mark,
Change your query to this:
SELECT id, count(*) FROM mytable GROUP BY id HAVING count(*) 2;
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org] On
Behalf Of Mark Fenbers
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:07 AM
To:
You may want to try Bucardo ... By performance, are you referring to latency?
If so, bandwidth between sites typically is the factor with latency in any
replication solution.
http://bucardo.org/
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org
I am trying to create a function that will grind through a cdr table and
populate another table. I am trying to load the function and am getting the
following error:
ERROR: function result type must be specified
CREATE FUNCTION gen_simultaneous_calls(mystart timestamp, mystop timestamp)
To: Plugge, Joe R.
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Function Syntax Help
2009/10/30 Plugge, Joe R. jrplu...@west.commailto:jrplu...@west.com
I am trying to create a function that will grind through a cdr table and
populate another table. I am trying to load the function and am getting
:= newstop + INTERVAL '1 minute';
END LOOP;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE;
From: epai...@googlemail.com [mailto:epai...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Brian
Modra
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 2:46 PM
To: Plugge, Joe R.
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Function Syntax Help
14 matches
Mail list logo
