Re: [Pharo-dev] Help with bugfix process

I do not have a real 32bit machine available, would it be ok to use a virtual 32bit machine? Julien On 07/02/16 13:26, Nicolai Hess wrote: No, you did it right, and it should work that way. At the Moment, we have a problem with uuid genetation on Linux 64bit. Can you try to recreate and

Re: [Pharo-dev] Recent changes in Bloc, no more BlMorph

On 06/02/16 20:37, Tudor Girba wrote: One of the ideas that drove the design is that Bloc should provide a simple yet flexible low level design, and allow higher level abstractions on top. For example, we would like to have an engine like Roassal be directly implemented using bloc elements,

Re: [Pharo-dev] Help with bugfix process

Yes, that should work. Am 07.02.2016 1:33 nachm. schrieb "Julien Delplanque" : > I do not have a real 32bit machine available, would it be ok to use a > virtual 32bit machine? > > Julien > > On 07/02/16 13:26, Nicolai Hess wrote: > >> No, you did it right, and it should work

Re: [Pharo-dev] Help with bugfix process

No, you did it right, and it should work that way. At the Moment, we have a problem with uuid genetation on Linux 64bit. Can you try to recreate and resubmit the change on a 32bit Machine? Am 07.02.2016 1:05 nachm. schrieb "Julien Delplanque" : > Hello, > > I am trying to

Re: [Pharo-dev] Help with bugfix process

I just tried using Lubuntu 32 bits on Virtualbox and I still have the same problem... Is it possible that the problem is something else? Julien On 07/02/16 13:41, Julien Delplanque wrote: Ok I will try this :-). Julien On 07/02/16 13:36, Nicolai Hess wrote: Yes, that should work. Am

Re: [Pharo-dev] Help with bugfix process

Ok I will try this :-). Julien On 07/02/16 13:36, Nicolai Hess wrote: Yes, that should work. Am 07.02.2016 1:33 nachm. schrieb "Julien Delplanque" : I do not have a real 32bit machine available, would it be ok to use a virtual 32bit machine? Julien On 07/02/16 13:26,

Re: [Pharo-dev] Best way to access icons?

Le 5/2/16 09:21, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit : of course, but since we have not implemented such mechanism, we need to go one step at a time… yes but this is good to think about a good solution. :) At least this is good to know that you do not consider that as the final answer (because it

Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] We are in "code freeze" for Pharo 5

We are on “just bugfixes” since some time now… I delayed the announcement because Epicea still needs to enter and we didn’t manage to include it yet. But well… with the exception of Epicea, no new features will be included un Pharo 5… just bugfixes (and we have a lot of

Re: [Pharo-dev] Epicea tests failure under Windows (WAS: RE: [ANN] We are in "code freeze" for Pharo 5)

Very interesting... I created case 17543 , with Vincent's script and other quotes from this thread. I did it because this Windows issue is independent from Epicea (whose integration only exposed the Windows