Re: [Pharo-dev] Recommended production VM on latest macOS Sierra?

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Tim Mackinnon wrote: > So does that mean we should use the Pharo5 vm for production then? It > sounds like 6 is still a bit bleeding edge There is probably no stability advantage in Pharo-5-32bit over Pharo-6-32bit, and "6" will be supported

Re: [Pharo-dev] Recommended production VM on latest macOS Sierra?

Ahh - thats more reassuring. There is quite a lot going on at the moment and so it gets a bit overwhelming. Thanks for all the hard work you’ve put into this by the way - its really starting to open up the doors we all needed. Tim > On 5 Jul 2017, at 15:02, Esteban Lorenzano

Re: [Pharo-dev] Recommended production VM on latest macOS Sierra?

pharo 6 is very stable and should be used in production. every version has bugs, that will not change. Yes, that particular bug can be annoying but it does not happens always (for example, I’m unable to reproduce it, which is in fact part of the reason why I cannot fix it). cheers, Esteban >

[Pharo-dev] SmartTest

Hi everyone, I’m working on a new plugin for Nautilus/Calypso that will help us with the test. The goal is to provide us the selection of tests we should run after a modification. It would be great if you accept to try it or want to use it. Currently, by installing the plugin,

Re: [Pharo-dev] Recommended production VM on latest macOS Sierra?

So does that mean we should use the Pharo5 vm for production then? It sounds like 6 is still a bit bleeding edge and for production applications we should wait for 6.1? At the moment it seems a little chaotic - we all like the new features, and 6 is definitely a breath of fresh air - however

[Pharo-dev] Ideas wanted: "Patterns to sustain feedback loops"

Hi, I want to do a third talk at ESUG as the “part 3” of the feedback loop series.. The first parts where: 1. Nomads do not build Cathedrals: https://www.slideshare.net/MarcusDenker/2014-esugcathedral 2. Perfection and Feedback Loops: Why worse is better.

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pull requests reviews

don’t need it. I’m working on tool for that :) > On 5 Jul 2017, at 10:02, Guillermo Polito wrote: > > If you don't mind, I'll transform your script into a class and commit it > somewhere :) > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Pavel Krivanek

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pull requests reviews

If you don't mind, I'll transform your script into a class and commit it somewhere :) On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > So loading of the PR packages is very simple. Do at the end: > > diff := IceDiff from: headCommit to: bootstrapCommit. > diff

Re: [Pharo-dev] P6 crashed image

Hi David, Removing did not make the image to start, althought it produces a different output. But never mind. Stephane, the image crash is not such a big deal. Now I really want to use Glamour because it can help to produce more friendly user interface for kids and scripting. Hilaire Le

[Pharo-dev] [ANN] association.pharo.org now on AWS

Hi, I just changed the DNS entry for https://association.pharo.org It now runs on Amazon AWS, this should make it faster and more reliable than in the past. Marcus

Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] Iceberg 0.5 released

Great! All I wanted to hear! Thanks, Norbert > Am 05.07.2017 um 07:56 schrieb Stephane Ducasse : > > Yes there will be a nice 6.1 because we care of people. > > Stef > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote: >> >> Am 03.07.2017

Re: [Pharo-dev] [ANN] for P7, default VM for linux moved to threaded

usually, you will not notice a problem. but threaded is needed for Iceberg and OSSubprocess to work :( Esteban > On 5 Jul 2017, at 07:54, Stephane Ducasse wrote: > > What are the implications? > > Stef > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Esteban Lorenzano