Re: [Pharo-dev] Bloc, Bloc 2 and Brick

2016-08-09 Thread stepharo
Le 7/8/16 à 17:01, webwarrior a écrit : stepharo wrote ... In June we spent three days to understand if we should merge Bloc2 into Bloc and we decided the inverse because his implementation is based on SDL and a separate window) it does not suffer from the morphic plague. So for

Re: [Pharo-dev] Bloc, Bloc 2 and Brick

2016-08-07 Thread webwarrior
stepharo wrote > ... > > In June we spent three days to understand if we should merge Bloc2 > into Bloc and we decided the inverse because > his implementation is based on SDL and a separate window) it does > not suffer from the morphic plague. So for example > the event bubbling

Re: [Pharo-dev] Bloc, Bloc 2 and Brick

2016-08-02 Thread stepharo
Le 2/8/16 à 15:47, Ben Coman a écrit : On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote: Hi Stef, from past discussions/threads I know "Bloc" as Pharo's possible future UI, watched the video [1] and have played with the premade image from the CI Server. Also the Brick

Re: [Pharo-dev] Bloc, Bloc 2 and Brick

2016-08-02 Thread Ben Coman
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > Hi Stef, > > from past discussions/threads I know "Bloc" as Pharo's possible future UI, > watched the video [1] and have played with the premade > image from the CI Server. Also the Brick layer (which is on top of Bloc)

Re: [Pharo-dev] Bloc, Bloc 2 and Brick

2016-08-02 Thread Tudor Girba
Hi, We are still in exploration mode with respect to design and this is why you see several internal names. We expect to have a clear structure within a couple of weeks, and there will be an announcement on that. In the end, there will be exactly one single Bloc and one single Brick. Cheers,

[Pharo-dev] Bloc, Bloc 2 and Brick

2016-08-02 Thread Torsten Bergmann
Hi Stef, from past discussions/threads I know "Bloc" as Pharo's possible future UI, watched the video [1] and have played with the premade image from the CI Server. Also the Brick layer (which is on top of Bloc) was announced as a preview once [2]. Now in some of the mails it was mentioned