On 2013-05-23, at 07:52, stephane ducasse stephane.duca...@free.fr wrote:
On May 23, 2013, at 4:22 AM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.ber...@me.com wrote:
What do you think?
I think we should have a stable and strong Versionner. As soon as making a
software release is more than clicking one
- Original Message -
| From: Camillo Bruni camillobr...@gmail.com
| To: pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org
| Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 8:53:31 AM
| Subject: [Pharo-dev] Messy Configurations
|
| I recently spent some time to revise how to write Metacello
| Configurations.
|
| Observation
as you continue to push the boundaries of Smalltalk.
Yes I like that expression :)
Stef
+100!
On 22.05.2013, at 17:53, Camillo Bruni camillobr...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently spent some time to revise how to write Metacello Configurations.
Observation:
- many configurations are quite a mess
- many configurations duplicate code internally
- many configurations
On 22 May 2013 17:53, Camillo Bruni camillobr...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently spent some time to revise how to write Metacello Configurations.
Observation:
- many configurations are quite a mess
- many configurations duplicate code internally
- many configurations have archived
On May 22, 2013, at 5:53 PM, Camillo Bruni camillobr...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently spent some time to revise how to write Metacello Configurations.
Observation:
- many configurations are quite a mess
- many configurations duplicate code internally
- many configurations have
On May 23, 2013, at 4:22 AM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.ber...@me.com wrote:
What do you think?
I think we should have a stable and strong Versionner. As soon as making a
software release is more than clicking one button, we will end up with messy
configurations.
Yes christophe worked
