On 09/05/2013 05:01 AM, David T. Lewis wrote:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 08:38:04AM +0200, Marcus Denker wrote:
Why do you need to support Squeak 3.8? This is how many years old?
I really do not understand this idea to be compatible to all old versions ever.
I do not think that there is any
30367
-
11502 Override Class #setName:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11502
10548 All system processes should have proper names
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10548
Diff information:
http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Tools-MarcusDenker.1234.diff
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2-Validation/label=win/467/
1 regressions found.
Zinc.Zodiac.ZnHTTPSTests.testGetPharoVersion
30368
-
11530 AbstractNautilusUI categorizeAllUncategorizedMethods broken
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11530
11497 pharo CI.image --list shows empty entry for default command line handler
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11497
11528 Harden
A big thank you from me as well , PBE definetly made possible to use Pharo.
If I had to read pharo code to understand how to work I would be right back
with python by now.
Pharo can learn tons of things from the success of python , I am very glad
to see that you guys put big priority on
Thanks.
I have merged -dtl.33 and two more change in
OSProcess-Base-ThierryGoubier.35 on
http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/ThierryGoubier/Alt30/main/ (osVersion and
vmVersion), if you want to merge them as well.
I have a question: are you sure about the perform: #delete in OSProcess
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 9:51 AM, no-re...@ci.inria.fr wrote:
1 regressions found.
Zinc.Zodiac.ZnHTTPSTests.testGetPharoVersion
it seems that this test fails very often. Can we do anything about it?
--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
Success is the ability to go from
Found some improvements for the wiki page on fogbugz.
I don't see a way to make changes myself.
- refer to the smalltalkhub repositories, explain the squeaksource
history;
- the flow is not so clear in the difference between describing the
contribution and where to put it (attachment, paste
30369
-
11487 Less failed block: First #failedDoit removal in new compiler
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11487
11531 More refactorings: system should use new compiler API
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11531
Diff information:
I changed some settings in FogBugz, can you try to edit the wiki again?
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?pg=pgWikiixWikiPage=39command=edit
... and yes, these pages outdate quicker than I thought :(
On 2013-09-05, at 06:38, Stephan Eggermont step...@stack.nl wrote:
Found some
On 05 Sep 2013, at 11:25, Damien Cassou damien.cas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 9:51 AM, no-re...@ci.inria.fr wrote:
1 regressions found.
Zinc.Zodiac.ZnHTTPSTests.testGetPharoVersion
it seems that this test fails very often. Can we do anything about it?
It only fails on
30370
-
11529 MetacelloConfigurationBrowser open not working
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11529
11062 Remove old compiler API from Pharo image Part 2
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11062
Diff information:
I think we already checked that, but it has nothing to do the with
a particular windows slave, no?
On 2013-09-05, at 10:07, Sven Van Caekenberghe s...@stfx.eu wrote:
On 05 Sep 2013, at 11:25, Damien Cassou damien.cas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 9:51 AM, no-re...@ci.inria.fr
Le 05/09/2013 14:19, David T. Lewis a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 11:18:27AM +0200, Goubier Thierry wrote:
Thanks.
I have merged -dtl.33 and two more change in
OSProcess-Base-ThierryGoubier.35 on
http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/ThierryGoubier/Alt30/main/ (osVersion and
vmVersion), if you want
On 05 Sep 2013, at 15:14, Camillo Bruni camillobr...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we already checked that, but it has nothing to do the with
a particular windows slave, no?
I am actually pretty clueless, I think this test just passes on Windows when
run interactively in an image with UI.
On
works.
But that doesn't mean that I have all the answers...
Stephan
Today i tried again with a fresh pharo 2.0 image and loaded the latest version
of Roassal and RoassalProposals.
Now it works ... will now dig a bit deeper :-)
Thank you,
Volkert
On 02.09.2013, at 09:38, Volkert Barr volk...@nivoba.de wrote:
Dear Alexandre,
which Pharo and Roassal
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:37 PM, J.F. Rick s...@je77.com wrote:
apt-get install libpulse-dev
the *-dev packages are only useful when you compile packages. If you
don't want to compile C files, you only need the non -dev packages
(libpulse0).
--
Damien Cassou
Hi,
The GSoC deadlines is 16 september. It means than i have one week to fix
bugs and implements some new features. The best way to find bugs is user
feedbacks.
I will be glad to fix many bugs than you will find. (many bugs found in 5
minutes with my mentor ...)
Here is instructions to load
thanks erwan
It is nice to see that you are making progress.
Stef
On Sep 5, 2013, at 9:16 PM, Erwan Douaille douailleer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The GSoC deadlines is 16 september. It means than i have one week to fix bugs
and implements some new features. The best way to find bugs is user
Hello.
I try to first load on pharo 2.0 and I spend the same, then in 3.0 and ran
smoothly. It might be good to clarify this in the blog :)
Regards.
2013/9/5 Erwan Douaille douailleer...@gmail.com
You have to use the latest Pharo 3.0 version:
http://files.pharo.org/image/30/latest.zip
It
Hi Erwan,
I've tried to load your work using the configuration, but I got:
This package depends on the following classes:
TreeNodeModel
TabModel
WorldModel
TabManagerModel
You must resolve these dependencies before you will be able to load these
definitions:
properties
uiPainter
Ok, super!
Let us know how it goes
Alexandre
On Sep 5, 2013, at 9:51 AM, Volkert Barr volk...@nivoba.de wrote:
Today i tried again with a fresh pharo 2.0 image and loaded the latest
version of Roassal and RoassalProposals.
Now it works ... will now dig a bit deeper :-)
Thank
Who says that? We always said that we will back-port all imported fixes to
2.0. We will not back-port *everything*, especially
not improvements that are not fixes, because then there would be no
difference between Pharo3 and Pharo2 (and these
tend to introduce new problems, making it
great!
tx
sven can you add it to the readme so that when I turn it into a pier chapter
we get it :)
https://github.com/svenvc/docs/blob/master/neo/neo-json-paper.md has been
updated
Using the newly added NeoJSONCustomMapping#mapWithValueSchema: this is
now possible, as the following
You have to use the latest Pharo 3.0 version:
http://files.pharo.org/image/30/latest.zip
It looks like Spec isn't loaded in your image. I didn't add any Spec
dependencies in the Configuration due than Spec is loaded by default in
Pharo 3.0
Hope it will work :)
2013/9/5 Alexandre Bergel
No. Just admit that you have productions 1.4 (and maybe 1.3) hanging around,
that 2.0 is the main development platform for Pharo users, 3.0 is where you
make interesting stuff.
Yes we admit it and then?
We are concerned to help people.
Did you run the rules generated from
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 03:31:06PM +0200, Goubier Thierry wrote:
Le 05/09/2013 14:19, David T. Lewis a ?crit :
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 11:18:27AM +0200, Goubier Thierry wrote:
Thanks.
I have merged -dtl.33 and two more change in
OSProcess-Base-ThierryGoubier.35 on
On Sep 5, 2013, at 10:25 AM, kilon theki...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
A big thank you from me as well , PBE definetly made possible to use Pharo.
If I had to read pharo code to understand how to work I would be right back
with python by now.
thanks.
Pharo can learn tons of things from the success
I post it: http://uipainter-gsoc.over-blog.com/
2013/9/5 Gastón Dall' Oglio gaston.dallog...@gmail.com
Hello.
I try to first load on pharo 2.0 and I spend the same, then in 3.0 and ran
smoothly. It might be good to clarify this in the blog :)
Regards.
2013/9/5 Erwan Douaille
I am also checking the platform subtype implementation (OSProcess
platformSubtype).
In Pharo:
Smalltalk os subtype == 'i686'
This reflects the processor type, not the os subtype (it should be 'x86_64'
on my PC).
Is this intentional?
I don't think so.
Marcus
Thanks!
2013/9/5 Erwan Douaille douailleer...@gmail.com
I post it: http://uipainter-gsoc.over-blog.com/
2013/9/5 Gastón Dall' Oglio gaston.dallog...@gmail.com
Hello.
I try to first load on pharo 2.0 and I spend the same, then in 3.0 and
ran smoothly. It might be good to clarify this in
32 matches
Mail list logo
