[Pharo-dev] [pharo-project/pharo-core]

2014-10-09 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/tags/40292 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

[Pharo-dev] [pharo-project/pharo-core] 64869d: 40292

2014-10-09 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/4.0 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core Commit: 64869d4fa7bbbd94f0764df922abd455be02ddfc https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/64869d4fa7bbbd94f0764df922abd455be02ddfc Author: Jenkins Build Server bo...@pharo-project.org Date:

Re: [Pharo-dev] ShoreLine Reporter - A tool to collect stack traces

2014-10-09 Thread Tommaso Dal Sasso
Hello, thanks for the feedback! I uploaded the slides here: http://shoreline.inf.usi.ch/files/ESUG2014.pdf (I tried slideshare, but it didm't work...). The video of the presentation is among the ESUG2014 videos, this are the direct links:

Re: [Pharo-dev] ShoreLine Reporter - A tool to collect stack traces

2014-10-09 Thread Marcus Denker
On 09 Oct 2014, at 11:25, Tommaso Dal Sasso tommaso.dalsa...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, thanks for the feedback! I uploaded the slides here: http://shoreline.inf.usi.ch/files/ESUG2014.pdf (I tried slideshare, but it didm't work…) They are on the ESUG account:

[Pharo-dev] Building diffs

2014-10-09 Thread Yuriy Tymchuk
Hi, What is the best way to find a difference between methods? I’ve tried to use TextDiffBuilder, but it’s very inaccurate, as it reports dive by line, and then even indentation is rated as change of whole line. Is there anything better? Cheers! Uko

Re: [Pharo-dev] List Method selection could be improved

2014-10-09 Thread Stephan Eggermont
Phil wrote: Pharo3: keep your finger on shift at all times to move multiple things. Christophe Demarey showed it to me as I was complaining. Still, completely unintuitive. Not as bad as TestRunner's way of dealing with selections, but still very bad. There are lots of open/closed issues for it

[Pharo-dev] [pharo-project/pharo-core] c8df5e: 40293

2014-10-09 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/4.0 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core Commit: c8df5e8deb5568f3f0351bab09fc0be644933dd8 https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/c8df5e8deb5568f3f0351bab09fc0be644933dd8 Author: Jenkins Build Server bo...@pharo-project.org Date:

[Pharo-dev] [pharo-project/pharo-core]

2014-10-09 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/tags/40293 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

[Pharo-dev] [pharo-project/pharo-core]

2014-10-09 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/tags/40294 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

[Pharo-dev] [pharo-project/pharo-core] 81a7f2: 40294

2014-10-09 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/4.0 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core Commit: 81a7f2bc3c13fb7cd2ae8a954f823ebc130e8ecf https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/81a7f2bc3c13fb7cd2ae8a954f823ebc130e8ecf Author: Jenkins Build Server bo...@pharo-project.org Date:

Re: [Pharo-dev] Building diffs

2014-10-09 Thread Dale Henrichs
Yuriy, For tODE is use TextDiffBuilder, but I format the source before doing the diff ... it's still line by line, but formatting differences are eliminated ... Dale On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk yuriy.tymc...@me.com wrote: Hi, What is the best way to find a difference

Re: [Pharo-dev] Building diffs

2014-10-09 Thread Yuriy Tymchuk
Yes, I’ve tried to use pretty printed version, the problem is that if you wrap something in a block, then it’s indented anyway, and so it looks like you’ve replaced a lot. Uko On 09 Oct 2014, at 18:39, Dale Henrichs dale.henri...@gemtalksystems.com wrote: Yuriy, For tODE is use

Re: [Pharo-dev] Building diffs

2014-10-09 Thread Dale Henrichs
Yuriy, In that case, I'd be inclined to strip the leading whitespace off of the lines and do the diff ... TextDiffBuilder could probably be subclassed/extended to remove leading whitespace for diff and then restore the whitespace for diff ... Dale On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk

Re: [Pharo-dev] Android VM update

2014-10-09 Thread Denis Kudriashov
You are doing great job, Jean. 2014-10-06 13:30 GMT+04:00 Jean Baptiste Arnaud jbaptiste.arn...@gmail.com : Hi, I just comeback from holiday, and I realise that I do not have done a announcement yet. Now the prototype of the Pharo Android VM work. - Event is managed - Resolution up to

Re: [Pharo-dev] Android VM update

2014-10-09 Thread Pablo R. Digonzelli
Great ! thanks Jean Ing. Pablo Digonzelli Software Solutions IP-Solutiones SRL Metrotec SRL 25 de Mayo 521 Email: pdigonze...@softsargentina.com pdigonze...@gmail.com Cel: 5493815982714 De: Denis Kudriashov dionisi...@gmail.com Para: Pharo Development List pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-dev] OSProcess in 3.0

2014-10-09 Thread Noury Bouraqadi
Hi, Just tried to install the stable version of OSProcess using the configuration browser on a 3.0. I noticed it is still on http://www.squeaksource.com/OSProcess. Does it mean it is dead? if yes, what is the alternative? Thanx Noury

Re: [Pharo-dev] OSProcess in 3.0

2014-10-09 Thread Thierry Goubier
Hi Noury, no, OSProcess on Squeaksource is not dead and is integrating all the changes needed for all the platforms it is running on. And as you can see, I very recently updated the configuration to make sure it was pointing to the very latest version. Regards, Thierry Le 09/10/2014

Re: [Pharo-dev] OSProcess in 3.0

2014-10-09 Thread David T. Lewis
Hi, Just tried to install the stable version of OSProcess using the configuration browser on a 3.0. I noticed it is still on http://www.squeaksource.com/OSProcess. Does it mean it is dead? if yes, what is the alternative? Hi Noury, OSProcess is alive and well. Let me know if you have any

Re: [Pharo-dev] OSProcess in 3.0

2014-10-09 Thread David T. Lewis
Thierry, Thanks for doing those configuration updates, I hit send before I saw your reply. Dave Hi Noury, no, OSProcess on Squeaksource is not dead and is integrating all the changes needed for all the platforms it is running on. And as you can see, I very recently updated the

Re: [Pharo-dev] Program visualisation

2014-10-09 Thread Thierry Goubier
Hi Florin, Le 08/10/2014 04:45, Florin Mateoc a écrit : Hi again, I don't understand the self-defeating part. Indeed, I do start with some knowledge, and because of that, initially I can come up with some external representation, which reflects that understanding. After staring at it enough

Re: [Pharo-dev] OSProcess in 3.0

2014-10-09 Thread Thierry Goubier
Hi Dave, thanks to you. I updated OSProcess to 4.5.11 and CommandShell to 4.6.8; are those the latest? I did it last Sunday. Thierry Le 09/10/2014 22:42, David T. Lewis a écrit : Thierry, Thanks for doing those configuration updates, I hit send before I saw your reply. Dave Hi Noury,

Re: [Pharo-dev] OSProcess in 3.0

2014-10-09 Thread David T. Lewis
Darn, I think we must have both done our updates on the same day. The last update I did was this (time stamp is GMT -4 hours) : CommandShell-dtl.76 Dave Lewis, 5 October 2014 5:29:32 pm CommandShell 4.6.9 Improve pipe closing for PipeableOSProcess classcommand: and related methods to support

Re: [Pharo-dev] Program visualisation

2014-10-09 Thread Florin Mateoc
Hi Thierry, On 10/9/2014 4:52 PM, Thierry Goubier wrote: I'm currently on a medium to long term quest to learn in depth / maybe improve the AST automatic generation in SmaCC; it should give me a core foundation (a common API for the ASTs for all langages that SmaCC can parse) to build upon