Thanks, Nicolas (and Sven),
VM search path is what I am looking for (UFFI external modules) and I am
curious whether or not this path `pharo-vm/lib/pharo/5.0-201806281256`
is constant or variable for the various Pharo versions or does it vary
based on the vm version/build number ... pharo6.0
Oh, maybe you're after PharoLauncher conventions?
I was talking of underlying VM search path.
I remember that the library loading happens in ioLoadModule() both for FFI
and external plugins.
https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/search?q=ioLoadModule_q=ioLoadModule
Le ven. 25 janv.
Maybe FileLocator can help ?
on macOS
FileLocator vmDirectory pathString.
"'/Users/sven/Develop/Pharo/Pharo-Daily/2019-01-24/pharo-vm'"
FileLocator vmBinary pathString.
"'/Users/sven/Develop/Pharo/Pharo-Daily/2019-01-24/pharo-vm/Pharo.app/Contents/MacOS/Pharo'"
on Linux
$ ../bin/pharo
Thanks Nicolas,
Is it as simple as pharo/*, or could there be multiple directories
created and I need to pick the right one?
Dale
On 1/25/19 12:48 AM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
I'm afraid it also depends on the overly complex rules burried deep
inside the VM...
It would be a good thing to try
Hi All,
I find this talk profound and key to making functional open source
communities as we try and survive.
I’ve skipped an introduction in Portuguese and some slide control issues.
https://youtu.be/vDjazcMm-eE?t=4m40s
_,,,^..^,,,_ (phone)
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the pointer, I subscribed to those two mailing lists as well.
Cheers,
Manuel
> On 25 Jan 2019, at 14:25, Ben Coman wrote:
>
> Hi Manuel,
>
> This level question would be better handled on pharo-dev and vm-dev mail
> lists (forwarded a copy).
>
Congrats on the release, a major leap forward!
Torsten Bergmann wrote
> We have a large community with many, many users - but still only a few
> contribute to the core system.
>
> I wonder why and would like to know:
> - Is it due to the switch to git ?
> - Is is due to the new
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #25 was: FAILURE.
The Pull Request #2286 was integrated: "2302-Context comment typos"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/2286
Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/patch
Build Url:
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #24 was: FAILURE.
The Pull Request #2286 was integrated: "2302-Context comment typos"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/2286
Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/patch
Build Url:
I'm afraid it also depends on the overly complex rules burried deep inside
the VM...
It would be a good thing to try and document it.
And if we can't reasonably document it, then we might want to open an issue
on opensmalltalk.
Le ven. 25 janv. 2019 à 01:51, Dale Henrichs <
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #23 was: FAILURE.
The Pull Request #2286 was integrated: "2302-Context comment typos"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/2286
Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/patch
Build Url:
11 matches
Mail list logo