Re: [Pharo-dev] [Moose-dev] feenk log

Hi, Bindings is an issue indeed. They are at the same level as theming and we are not at that level yet. At present time we are focused on showing the breadth of what we can achieve with the new infrastructure. We are currently using only the Bloc keybinding mechanism (equivalent to

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Moose-dev] feenk log

Hi Doru this is great. We are brainstorming to see if and how Commander should be tuned to offer a smoother extensibility. Julien was developing commands for all his spec tools and guille used commander for Iceberg. We plan to have a meeting brainstorming about commands and context when

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Moose-dev] feenk log

On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 12:48, Tudor Girba wrote: > > Hi, > > We again got carried away and forgot to update the world about what is up in > our corner. Here is a summary: Thanks for the update. Nice to see the progress. > > -- > Bloc & Brick > -- > > - Text editor stability has been

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Moose-dev] feenk log

Hi, > On Jan 21, 2018, at 10:37 PM, Ben Coman wrote: > > On 21 January 2018 at 23:55, Tudor Girba wrote: >> Hi, >> >> There is a difference in performance. The Announcement is slower (about 2-3x >> slower). However, for 1M events the difference is

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Moose-dev] feenk log

this looks really cool. For the event I remember the discussion with glenn about the difference and I forgot. Stef > On 21 Jan 2018, at 15:54, Tudor Girba wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is an update of the work on Bloc and GT. As always, please do let us > know what you

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Moose-dev] feenk log

Great work guys! Even though I don't have much time to work with Bloc yet, every time I play with it, I find it really enjoyable. :) Also +1 for draggable elements, another thing to tick of my "must have" list. :) Peter