Re: [Pharo-dev] [Vm-dev] OT: Convince me github is a wise choice

2015-12-18 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
Google has several projects that they put serious effort and resources, the rest is just either abandonware or with very low activity. Google code was on such example. Half baked, limited, ugly and unchanged for years. I never understood why anyone would choose to host his project on google code.

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Vm-dev] OT: Convince me github is a wise choice

2015-12-17 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
You can have your own Git infraestructure with something like GitLab Community Edition (Free) or Enterprise (Paid). The "good thing" about Github is that it gives visibility to what you do, which for Pharo/Squeak could be a big thing. If all the code in

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Vm-dev] OT: Convince me github is a wise choice

2015-12-17 Thread Nicolas Anquetil
On 17/12/2015 20:46, Peter Uhnák wrote: Ah, that's interesting. So my concern is whether github is a safe long-term bet. Specifically what is there to prevent some third party from buying github, or of github going public and the board taking the decision, or github on its own, deciding

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Vm-dev] OT: Convince me github is a wise choice

2015-12-17 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
2015-12-17 17:08 GMT-03:00 Nicolas Anquetil : > > > On 17/12/2015 20:46, Peter Uhnák wrote: >>> >>> Ah, that's interesting. So my concern is whether github is a safe >>> long-term bet. Specifically what is there to prevent some third party from >>> buying github, or of

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Vm-dev] OT: Convince me github is a wise choice

2015-12-17 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
Google is king of abandonware , they have closed down half of their software projects, Google Code was just the tip of the iceberg . The other half is close to be abandoned or at least heavily outdated. Moreover google code was crappy anyway, its close down went unnoticed. Github is nowhere

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Vm-dev] OT: Convince me github is a wise choice

2015-12-17 Thread Peter Uhnák
> Ah, that's interesting. So my concern is whether github is a safe long-term > bet. Specifically what is there to prevent some third party from buying > github, or of github going public and the board taking the decision, or > github on its own, deciding to charge for hosting, keeping the

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Vm-dev] OT: Convince me github is a wise choice

2015-12-17 Thread p...@highoctane.be
Git is a DVCS. Github happens to be hosting repos, but it is just a remote that one pushes to. You can have multiple remotes and push to them. So, a project can have a couple remotes to push/pull to/from. e.g. I have a couple things going on now where one company uses github private repos and

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Vm-dev] OT: Convince me github is a wise choice

2015-12-17 Thread Ben Coman
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > Google is king of abandonware , they have closed down half of their software > projects, Google Code was just the tip of the iceberg . The other half is > close to be abandoned or at least heavily outdated.

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Vm-dev] OT: Convince me github is a wise choice

2015-12-17 Thread Peter Uhnák
> well, googlecode closed didn't it? > and it was not a small affair either And all you needed was to click on a button and magically it was on github. But this is very different scenario to what the worry is about. When GitHub one day closes GoogleCode style, then there is nothing to worry