On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Tim Mackinnon wrote:
> Is there a way for this to get back into 6.1 - so we can shoot for a
> stable 6.x version that will last us for a year while 7.x is under
> development?
>
> I’m not familiar with how point release are handled in Pharo, and
I like your answer nicolas.
If this is really important for any business or any dev around let us know
we can just tag it and we will port it for 6.2.
Stef
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Nicolas Cellier
wrote:
> Hi Tim,
> I'd say: is this a showstopper?
>
It’s a fair point - I guess if enough things crop up, then a 6.2 release gets
contemplated.
Tim
> On 14 Aug 2017, at 10:29, Nicolas Cellier
> wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
> I'd say: is this a showstopper?
> How often do you raise a Fraction to the power of another
Hi Tim,
I'd say: is this a showstopper?
How often do you raise a Fraction to the power of another Fraction with
large denominator (> 1)?
Or is it used indirectly by some kind of Framework?
If yes then open a pharo bug entry and mark for 6.x, else just wait 7.x...
Nicolas
2017-08-14 10:49
Is there a way for this to get back into 6.1 - so we can shoot for a stable 6.x
version that will last us for a year while 7.x is under development?
I’m not familiar with how point release are handled in Pharo, and I get the
impression that this is going to be a slightly rockier year as there
Tx eliot.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:55 AM, Eliot Miranda wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Andrei Chis
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was executing this code '(2009/2000) ** (3958333/10)' with the
>> Pharo6.1