Thanks Dave!
Guille was taking care of OSSubprocess recently. I fixed bugs and issues last
year.
I do not think that mariano is looking at it.
Stef
> On 18 Mar 2019, at 03:19, David T. Lewis wrote:
>
> Hi Mariano,
>
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 08:29:59PM -0300, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 10:20, David T. Lewis wrote:
> Hi Mariano,
>
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 08:29:59PM -0300, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
> > >
> > > ducasse wrote
> > > > this is not because we do not care of Pharo that we will fix it
> > > > immediately.
> > >
> > > Yes of course, just want
Hi Mariano,
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 08:29:59PM -0300, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
> >
> > ducasse wrote
> > > this is not because we do not care of Pharo that we will fix it
> > > immediately.
> >
> > Yes of course, just want to keep it on the radar (and maybe Mariano will
> > read he he)
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> ducasse wrote
> > this is not because we do not care of Pharo that we will fix it
> > immediately.
>
> Yes of course, just want to keep it on the radar (and maybe Mariano will
> read he he)
>
>
I always do :)
But honestly, I don't have enough time to carry on that myself. As you
could
> ducasse wrote
>> Our main problem is that
>> - if more people would review PR
>> - send PRs
>
> Thank you for the reminder of that bottleneck. I will try to do that more
> now that we have moved to GH. The old process seemed too cumbersome to be
> able to effectively utilize a few
ducasse wrote
> Our main problem is that
> - if more people would review PR
> - send PRs
Thank you for the reminder of that bottleneck. I will try to do that more
now that we have moved to GH. The old process seemed too cumbersome to be
able to effectively utilize a few free moments
Hi sean
You see we are terribly busy working on a lot of cleaning in Spec.
This is massive and this is super important for our roadmap.
Guille and Pablo produce 600 tests.
We are fixing duplication with Alain.
Our main problem is that
- if more people would review PR
- send
Max Leske wrote
>> I was talking about OSSubProcess
> Well, I'm not working with that at the moment ;)
[OT] Just want to bump the problem that OSProcess and OSSubProcess can't
currently be used in the same image. This is an important problem because
users can't control which library dependencies
On 14 Mar 2019, at 20:00, ducasse wrote:
I was talking about OSSubProcess
Well, I'm not working with that at the moment ;)
On 14 Mar 2019, at 18:21, Tim Mackinnon wrote:
I’ve been using OSProcess on OSX for exercism (development mode)
and its been working fine. (I’ve been piping a go
Ohh - yeah, I can’t use that as it doesn’t support windows right? (It’s all a
bit confusing)
Tim
Sent from my iPhone
Sent from my iPhone
> On 14 Mar 2019, at 19:00, ducasse wrote:
>
> I was talking about OSSubProcess
I was talking about OSSubProcess
> On 14 Mar 2019, at 18:21, Tim Mackinnon wrote:
>
> I’ve been using OSProcess on OSX for exercism (development mode) and its been
> working fine. (I’ve been piping a go executable output to run a generation
> command)
>
>> On 14 Mar 2019, at 16:38, ducasse
I’ve been using OSProcess on OSX for exercism (development mode) and its been
working fine. (I’ve been piping a go executable output to run a generation
command)
> On 14 Mar 2019, at 16:38, ducasse wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 14 Mar 2019, at 17:33, Max Leske wrote:
>>
>> On 13 Mar 2019, at 11:55,
> On 14 Mar 2019, at 17:33, Max Leske wrote:
>
> On 13 Mar 2019, at 11:55, ducasse wrote:
>
>> Ok now one of these days we will have to have all the important libraries
>> hosted in the same place.
>> It is not sure that we will maintain MC forever.
>> For example SmalltalkHub should get
On 13 Mar 2019, at 11:55, ducasse wrote:
Ok now one of these days we will have to have all the important
libraries hosted in the same place.
It is not sure that we will maintain MC forever.
For example SmalltalkHub should get readonly by the end of the year
(for lack of maintenance reason).
On 13 Mar 2019, at 11:55, ducasse wrote:
Ok now one of these days we will have to have all the important
libraries hosted in the same place.
It is not sure that we will maintain MC forever.
For example SmalltalkHub should get readonly by the end of the year
(for lack of maintenance reason).
Ok now one of these days we will have to have all the important libraries
hosted in the same place.
It is not sure that we will maintain MC forever.
For example SmalltalkHub should get readonly by the end of the year (for lack
of maintenance reason).
BTW is OSSubProcess working for you?
> Hi
Hi Stef,
On 11 Mar 2019, at 8:12, ducasse wrote:
Max
ifNotNilDo: was probably deprecated in Pharo 50 so this is a bit
normal that it got removed in P7. But we should check this.
I do not have the time today for this.
normally ifNotNilDo: should be covered by a migrator automatic rewrite
Hi Max,
use the following to load OSProcess:
Metacello new
configuration: 'OSProcess';
repository: 'http://www.squeaksource.com/MetacelloRepository';
load
As I said a while ago, the ifNotNilDo: thing was corrected long ago
and that configuration updated; the one in the catalog is
18 matches
Mail list logo
