On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk yuriy.tymc...@me.com wrote:
We have merged the parsers into one, because we had 3 parsers that didn’t
have any dedicated use-cases, juts were developed historical as at some
point someone needed a bit more functionality, and then different parsers
Le 5/2/15 10:40, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
On 05 Feb 2015, at 10:36, Ben Coman b...@openinworld.com wrote:
I personally would prefer to be able to use exponents. No sure what the big
picture is.
cheers -ben
Of course exponents are still supported ;-)
The discussion is about the +
On 06 Feb 2015, at 09:02, stepharo steph...@free.fr wrote:
Le 5/2/15 10:40, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
On 05 Feb 2015, at 10:36, Ben Coman b...@openinworld.com wrote:
I personally would prefer to be able to use exponents. No sure what the
big picture is.
cheers -ben
Of course
2015-02-06 16:18 GMT+01:00 Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr:
On 06 Feb 2015, at 11:45, Yuriy Tymchuk yuriy.tymc...@me.com wrote:
We have merged the parsers into one, because we had 3 parsers that
didn’t have any dedicated use-cases, juts were developed historical as at
some point
We have merged the parsers into one, because we had 3 parsers that didn’t have
any dedicated use-cases, juts were developed historical as at some point
someone needed a bit more functionality, and then different parsers were used
randomly on the system. As for the expression - yes we have to
I personally would prefer to be able to use exponents. No sure what the
big picture is.
cheers -ben
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck
marianop...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
In Pharo 2.0, the expression Number readFrom: '2.58500098e+04'
would answer 25850.01 ,
On 05 Feb 2015, at 10:36, Ben Coman b...@openinworld.com wrote:
I personally would prefer to be able to use exponents. No sure what the big
picture is.
cheers -ben
Of course exponents are still supported ;-)
The discussion is about the + sign for positive exponents. I am not sure, but I
