Re: [Pharo-dev] Proposal to remove [Stream|Collection]>>#write:

Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > > "Check the selectors used in the latest packages on squeaksource, ss3, > smalltalkhub and decide." > > are pure technical, intellectual arguments and not passive-aggressive > criticism. Right. Yes, it is a very, very serious response. A few years ago I did

Re: [Pharo-dev] Proposal to remove [Stream|Collection]>>#write:

ressive > criticism. Right. > >> On 22 Feb 2019, at 19:54, Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-dev >> wrote: >> >> >> From: Benoit St-Jean >> Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Proposal to remove [Stream|Collection]>>#write: >> Date: 22 February 2019 at 19:5

Re: [Pharo-dev] Proposal to remove [Stream|Collection]>>#write:

ueaksource, ss3, smalltalkhub and decide." are pure technical, intellectual arguments and not passive-aggressive criticism. Right. > On 22 Feb 2019, at 19:54, Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-dev > wrote: > > > From: Benoit St-Jean > Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Proposal to remove [

Re: [Pharo-dev] Proposal to remove [Stream|Collection]>>#write:

--- Begin Message --- Trying to be *somewhat* compatible and verifying (even quickly) that it's not breaking a gazillion things is the very least someone can do...  Backward compatibility is NOT a sin! ;) On 2019-02-22 13:45, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: On 22 Feb 2019, at 19:39, Stephan

Re: [Pharo-dev] Proposal to remove [Stream|Collection]>>#write:

> Am 22.02.2019 um 19:45 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe : > > > >> On 22 Feb 2019, at 19:39, Stephan Eggermont wrote: >> >> Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> . >>> >>> So I propose to remove [Stream|Collection]>>#write: >>> >>> What say thou ? >> >> Check the selectors used in the latest

Re: [Pharo-dev] Proposal to remove [Stream|Collection]>>#write:

> On 22 Feb 2019, at 19:39, Stephan Eggermont wrote: > > Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > . >> >> So I propose to remove [Stream|Collection]>>#write: >> >> What say thou ? > > Check the selectors used in the latest packages on squeaksource, ss3, > smalltalkhub and decide. > > Stephan You

Re: [Pharo-dev] Proposal to remove [Stream|Collection]>>#write:

Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: . > > So I propose to remove [Stream|Collection]>>#write: > > What say thou ? Check the selectors used in the latest packages on squeaksource, ss3, smalltalkhub and decide. Stephan

Re: [Pharo-dev] Proposal to remove [Stream|Collection]>>#write:

https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/2701 > On 22 Feb 2019, at 15:57, Alistair Grant wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 15:50, Esteban Maringolo wrote: >> >> El vie., 22 feb. 2019 a las 11:43, ducasse >> () escribió: >>> + 1 >>> :) >> >>> But I’m an easy person when it is about

Re: [Pharo-dev] Proposal to remove [Stream|Collection]>>#write:

On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 15:50, Esteban Maringolo wrote: > > El vie., 22 feb. 2019 a las 11:43, ducasse > () escribió: > > + 1 > > :) > > > But I’m an easy person when it is about cleaning. > > +1. That makes us two. +1 Cheers, Alistair

Re: [Pharo-dev] Proposal to remove [Stream|Collection]>>#write:

El vie., 22 feb. 2019 a las 11:43, ducasse () escribió: > + 1 > :) > But I’m an easy person when it is about cleaning. +1. That makes us two.

Re: [Pharo-dev] Proposal to remove [Stream|Collection]>>#write:

+ 1 :) But I’m an easy person when it is about cleaning. > On 22 Feb 2019, at 15:39, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > Hi, > > Did you know that both Stream and Collection respond to #write: (as an alias > to #<< and #add: respectively) ? I sure did not (and I did quite a bit of > stream

[Pharo-dev] Proposal to remove [Stream|Collection]>>#write:

Hi, Did you know that both Stream and Collection respond to #write: (as an alias to #<< and #add: respectively) ? I sure did not (and I did quite a bit of stream hacking). This selector is not used for these 2 receiver types in the standard image (except for one unit test), I never saw it