> On 11 Sep 2019, at 02:13, Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
>
> Looks like Christmas season opened early this year :)
>
> Jokes aside, I'm in favor of changing some of the characters we use for
> binary selectors to allow it to be used in keyword/unary messages.
>
> I'll include % in that list. For
> On 11 Sep 2019, at 04:07, James Foster wrote:
>
> Would use of ? and ! in unary/keyword selectors be convention or somehow
> required? If simply convention, then we should start with renaming testing
> methods to be named is* or has*.
> flag1 := anInteger even.“not g
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 2:14 AM Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
> Looks like Christmas season opened early this year :)
>
> Jokes aside, I'm in favor of changing some of the characters we use for
> binary selectors to allow it to be used in keyword/unary messages.
>
> I'll include % in that list. For me i
Hi all,
I wanted to try to get a Pharo image (the headless one to try the new gtk
binding) through the Pharo Zero conf on a Windows 10 machine.
So, I ran in the Powershell and the cmd: curl
https://get.pharo.org/64/vmHeadlessLatest80 | bash
But bash is not recognized under windows, so you e
[Apologies for Cross-Posting]
Dear all,
At DISP Lab, at Lyon, France, we have a PhD opening on « Ensuring
Interoperability for "smart" information systems". More information are
following.
What is important is that all the development will be done using Pharo/Moose.
If you are interested, plea
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #724 was: SUCCESS.
The Pull Request #4290 was integrated: "4287-Integrate-Ring2"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/4290
Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/4287
Build Url:
https://ci
Using ? for unary messages does not compose so well when you want to do
some logical conditions.
For example
self isClass? or: [ self isTrait? ] . It's readable, but probably you want
the ? just at the end of the sentence.
For ! one use case is to use it for factorial, like we do in Math. So 5 !
-
Did you try it in git bash (after installing git on Windows)? Git bash has
a lot of support (I think I used zeroconf that way before moving to WSL),
although it is not as much as cygwin.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019, 05:53 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I wanted to try to get a Pharo image (the headless one t
Yes It works thanks!
But, it is still not an optimal solution because you need to install git bash
and in windows bash scripts you have to mix with git bash commands.
Thanks,
Vincent
From: Pharo-dev On Behalf Of Christopher Fuhrman
Sent: Wednesday, 11 September 2019 13:31
To: Pharo De
Nice. Is it decided where should issues and PRs be reported? pharo or
original ring2 repo?
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:38 AM wrote:
>
> There is a new Pharo build available!
>
> The status of the build #724 was: SUCCESS.
>
> The Pull Request #4290 was integrated: "4287-Integrate-Ring2"
> Pull reque
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #725 was: FAILURE.
The Pull Request #4562 was integrated:
"4561-Ring-definitions-with-slots-use-category"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/4562
Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/4
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #726 was: FAILURE.
The Pull Request #4564 was integrated: "4563-reflectivity-update-rfValue"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/4564
Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/4563
Build Url:
No, directly to Pharo (unless it is for older versions), I will add
information to the original repository.
-- Pavel
st 11. 9. 2019 v 16:26 odesílatel Martin Dias napsal:
> Nice. Is it decided where should issues and PRs be reported? pharo or
> original ring2 repo?
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8
Le mer. 11 sept. 2019 à 10:40, Serge Stinckwich
a écrit :
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 2:14 AM Gabriel Cotelli
> wrote:
>
>> Looks like Christmas season opened early this year :)
>>
>> Jokes aside, I'm in favor of changing some of the characters we use for
>> binary selectors to allow it to be
Ah, and I forgot about your argumentation Stef:
you cannot forbid binary selectors altogether because some are ugly @@*+!!!
(I think I read this one in Asterix le gaulois)
for the same reasons that
youCanNOtfOrBIDunaYSElectORSWIthletTersBECauSESoMeaREUgly
Le mer. 11 sept. 2019 à 19:44, Nicolas Ce
Wait I do not understand what you are saying :)
I never said that I want to forbid anything. I just say that I would like that
? is not consider as a part of a binary selector.
Am’i clearer?
Stef
> On 11 Sep 2019, at 19:48, Nicolas Cellier
> wrote:
>
> Ah, and I forgot about your argumentat
It was just an answer to:
> Do not tell me that there is a value in these selectors?
I used the same argument for huge?:or!:???and:
But I don't think it's a valid argument: it's making induction starting
with a restricted set of examples...
I also tried to answer to why and when a binary selecto
When trying to convert Soup to Tonel, I got:
UndefinedObject(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #methodClass
RGMethodDefinition>>asMCMethodDefinitionFromActiveDefinition
RGMethodDefinition>>basicAsMCMethodDefinition
RGMethodDefinition>>asMCMethodDefinition
[ :ea | definitions add: ea asMCMethodDefinition
18 matches
Mail list logo
