Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg Default Subdirectory Setting?

> On 22 Sep 2017, at 10:01, stephan wrote: > > On 22-09-17 09:25, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >> In response to my: >>> You cannot use pattern 2 with shared repos. >> >> yes you can. >> shared repo is a suggestion, you can always chose to add a project from >> another place. >

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg Default Subdirectory Setting?

On 22-09-17 09:25, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: In response to my: You cannot use pattern 2 with shared repos. yes you can. shared repo is a suggestion, you can always chose to add a project from another place. Yes, so that makes pattern 2 practically impossible? Where am I going wrong? I

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg Default Subdirectory Setting?

> On 22 Sep 2017, at 09:20, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > > >> On 21 Sep 2017, at 20:08, stephan wrote: >> >> On 21-09-17 18:54, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >>> I do not understand what is the problem. >>> You have different approaches: >>> 1) you work always

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg Default Subdirectory Setting?

> On 21 Sep 2017, at 20:08, stephan wrote: > > On 21-09-17 18:54, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >> I do not understand what is the problem. >> You have different approaches: >> 1) you work always on same branch (even if you “jump” from branchs): like >> today I work on “issue-1”

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg Default Subdirectory Setting?

On 21-09-17 18:54, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: I do not understand what is the problem. You have different approaches: 1) you work always on same branch (even if you “jump” from branchs): like today I work on “issue-1” and tomorrow on “issue-2”. You just switch branchs on your iceberg tool and

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg Default Subdirectory Setting?

I do not understand what is the problem. You have different approaches: 1) you work always on same branch (even if you “jump” from branchs): like today I work on “issue-1” and tomorrow on “issue-2”. You just switch branchs on your iceberg tool and that’s all. 2) you work on different branchs

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg Default Subdirectory Setting?

Stephan Eggermont-3 wrote > The problem with that is that nearly none of the power users have such a > workflow. I assume that's why it's a setting ;) - Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg Default Subdirectory Setting?

On 21-09-17 16:07, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: Stephan Eggermont-3 wrote I'm not quite sure how that share repos works. My understanding is that it only works for certain straightforward workflows. Luckily, my guess is that many if not most users have such a workflow (e.g. single contributor/user

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg Default Subdirectory Setting?

Stephan Eggermont-3 wrote > I'm not quite sure how that share repos works. My understanding is that it only works for certain straightforward workflows. Luckily, my guess is that many if not most users have such a workflow (e.g. single contributor/user projects where everything is committed to

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg Default Subdirectory Setting?

On 21-09-17 03:40, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: Stephan Eggermont-3 wrote Is that shared with multiple images? There is already a setting to share repos (actually to set a default repo root folder). This setting would just be for where the packages live relative to the git root folder of that

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg Default Subdirectory Setting?

Stephan Eggermont-3 wrote > Is that shared with multiple images? There is already a setting to share repos (actually to set a default repo root folder). This setting would just be for where the packages live relative to the git root folder of that particular repo (e.g. ./src, ./repository, etc).

Re: [Pharo-dev] Iceberg Default Subdirectory Setting?

On 20/09/17 23:50, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: I always put my packages in gitroot/repository per instructions I read when I was starting with FT (Dale's IIRC). It's a (minor) drag to type that every time I add a local git repo. How would y'all feel about a setting? Is that shared with multiple