Re: [Pharo-dev] Shout style table editor (Request for Feedback)

[Nicolai Hess]

Thanks for  the feedback.

I'll start first with adding some small enhancements to the styler (so it
really uses all the existing style options)
see :
19179

Styler does not support all style table tokens


2016-10-11 21:37 GMT+02:00 stepharo :

>
>
> Le 10/10/16 à 19:30, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
>
>> Wow, that looks very nice !
>>
>
> + 10
> I want that :)
>
>
>
>> On 10 Oct 2016, at 18:42, Nicolai Hess  wrote:
>>>
>>> I am working on a syntax style table editor, see issue for some
>>> background about this.
>>> 18322 Settings for Syntax Highlighting a bit confusing
>>> 15409 A more complete set of syntactic colors is needed
>>>
>>>
>>> Load package
>>>
>>> ST-StylingPreview
>>> ST-StylingPreviewShoutExtension
>>>
>>> from
>>>
>>> MCHttpRepository
>>>  location: 'http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Ni
>>> colaiHess/StylerTableEditor/main'
>>>  user: ''
>>>  password: ''
>>>
>>> And open the preview/editor with:
>>>
>>> STStylerPreview open.
>>>
>>> This is a prototype, you can view builtin style tables, create and edit
>>> new custom style tables.
>>> This has some fake code styler methods to make the styling work for the
>>> code preview pane, and it supports more styling attributes than the
>>> default styler.
>>>
>>> This is what I would like to have as a syntax style setting dialog
>>> instead of the current
>>> confusing behavior. It may be helpful to actually see what syntax
>>> styling attributs are
>>> actually available.
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [Pharo-dev] Shout style table editor (Request for Feedback)

[stepharo]

Le 10/10/16 à 19:30, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :

Wow, that looks very nice !


+ 10
I want that :)




On 10 Oct 2016, at 18:42, Nicolai Hess  wrote:

I am working on a syntax style table editor, see issue for some background 
about this.
18322 Settings for Syntax Highlighting a bit confusing
15409 A more complete set of syntactic colors is needed


Load package

ST-StylingPreview
ST-StylingPreviewShoutExtension

from

MCHttpRepository
 location: 'http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/NicolaiHess/StylerTableEditor/main'
 user: ''
 password: ''

And open the preview/editor with:

STStylerPreview open.

This is a prototype, you can view builtin style tables, create and edit new 
custom style tables.
This has some fake code styler methods to make the styling work for the
code preview pane, and it supports more styling attributes than the default 
styler.

This is what I would like to have as a syntax style setting dialog instead of 
the current
confusing behavior. It may be helpful to actually see what syntax styling 
attributs are
actually available.

Re: [Pharo-dev] Shout style table editor (Request for Feedback)

[Yuriy Tymchuk]

Super cool!

> On 11 Oct 2016, at 10:26, Guille Polito  wrote:
> 
> Nice!
> 
> <3
> 
>  Original Message 
>> Wow, that looks very nice !
>> 
>>> On 10 Oct 2016, at 18:42, Nicolai Hess  wrote:
>>> 
>>> I am working on a syntax style table editor, see issue for some background 
>>> about this.
>>> 18322 Settings for Syntax Highlighting a bit confusing
>>> 15409 A more complete set of syntactic colors is needed
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Load package
>>> 
>>> ST-StylingPreview
>>> ST-StylingPreviewShoutExtension
>>> 
>>> from
>>> 
>>> MCHttpRepository
>>> location: 
>>> 'http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/NicolaiHess/StylerTableEditor/main'
>>> user: ''
>>> password: ''
>>> 
>>> And open the preview/editor with:
>>> 
>>> STStylerPreview open.
>>> 
>>> This is a prototype, you can view builtin style tables, create and edit new 
>>> custom style tables.
>>> This has some fake code styler methods to make the styling work for the
>>> code preview pane, and it supports more styling attributes than the default 
>>> styler.
>>> 
>>> This is what I would like to have as a syntax style setting dialog instead 
>>> of the current
>>> confusing behavior. It may be helpful to actually see what syntax styling 
>>> attributs are
>>> actually available.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Re: [Pharo-dev] Shout style table editor (Request for Feedback)

[Guille Polito]

Nice!

<3

 Original Message 

Wow, that looks very nice !


On 10 Oct 2016, at 18:42, Nicolai Hess  wrote:

I am working on a syntax style table editor, see issue for some background 
about this.
18322 Settings for Syntax Highlighting a bit confusing
15409 A more complete set of syntactic colors is needed


Load package

ST-StylingPreview
ST-StylingPreviewShoutExtension

from

MCHttpRepository
 location: 'http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/NicolaiHess/StylerTableEditor/main'
 user: ''
 password: ''

And open the preview/editor with:

STStylerPreview open.

This is a prototype, you can view builtin style tables, create and edit new 
custom style tables.
This has some fake code styler methods to make the styling work for the
code preview pane, and it supports more styling attributes than the default 
styler.

This is what I would like to have as a syntax style setting dialog instead of 
the current
confusing behavior. It may be helpful to actually see what syntax styling 
attributs are
actually available.

Re: [Pharo-dev] Shout style table editor (Request for Feedback)

[Sven Van Caekenberghe]

Wow, that looks very nice !

> On 10 Oct 2016, at 18:42, Nicolai Hess  wrote:
> 
> I am working on a syntax style table editor, see issue for some background 
> about this.
> 18322 Settings for Syntax Highlighting a bit confusing
> 15409 A more complete set of syntactic colors is needed
> 
> 
> Load package
> 
> ST-StylingPreview
> ST-StylingPreviewShoutExtension
> 
> from
> 
> MCHttpRepository
> location: 'http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/NicolaiHess/StylerTableEditor/main'
> user: ''
> password: ''
> 
> And open the preview/editor with:
> 
> STStylerPreview open.
> 
> This is a prototype, you can view builtin style tables, create and edit new 
> custom style tables.
> This has some fake code styler methods to make the styling work for the 
> code preview pane, and it supports more styling attributes than the default 
> styler.
> 
> This is what I would like to have as a syntax style setting dialog instead of 
> the current 
> confusing behavior. It may be helpful to actually see what syntax styling 
> attributs are
> actually available.
> 
> 
>