Re: [Pharo-users] Initializing a class with a Dictionary

2014-05-22 21:11 GMT+02:00 sergio_101 : > great! looking at STON next! thanks! > > You can find it in the configuration browser > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Clément Bera wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I think you should look at the STON framework. STON looks like JSON for >> smalltalk objects.

Re: [Pharo-users] deep into pharo(esug 2013) translate to korean draft version.

Deep into Pharo make use xetex. im dont have latex file. make from my templete. need more touch. but can use. thank you for all authur~ look here please. http://ta.onionmixer.net/wordpress/?attachment_id=265 ps. have a little problem. because wiki2latex using then need check for some s

[Pharo-users] TWM keybindings

hi, I installed version 3.0.1 of TWM for Pharo3, but the keybindings don't work in OSX - any idea what I need to do to make them work ? Cheers.

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

On 22 mai 2014, at 22:29, Luc Fabresse wrote: > > > > 2014-05-22 19:49 GMT+02:00 Camille Teruel : > > On 22 mai 2014, at 19:07, Luc Fabresse wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> 2014-05-22 18:06 GMT+02:00 Camille Teruel : >> >> On 22 mai 2014, at 11:54, stepharo wrote: >> >> > >> >> In general,

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

2014-05-22 19:49 GMT+02:00 Camille Teruel : > > On 22 mai 2014, at 19:07, Luc Fabresse wrote: > > > > > > 2014-05-22 18:06 GMT+02:00 Camille Teruel : > >> >> On 22 mai 2014, at 11:54, stepharo wrote: >> >> > >> >> In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the >> language come

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

2014-05-22 20:37 GMT+02:00 Esteban A. Maringolo : > 2014-05-22 13:06 GMT-03:00 Camille Teruel : > > > > On 22 mai 2014, at 11:54, stepharo wrote: > > > >> > >>> In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the > language comes with > >>> a good proxy model by default. > >> > >> +

Re: [Pharo-users] Pillar annotations for Latex

Hi Ben, On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Ben Coman wrote: > Now is there any important function missing, or is there a better way to do > this? thank you for your contribution. I would try to generate this instead: \begin{note} foo bar baz \end{note} This environment is meant fo

Re: [Pharo-users] Initializing a class with a Dictionary

great! looking at STON next! thanks! On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Clément Bera wrote: > Hello, > > I think you should look at the STON framework. STON looks like JSON for > smalltalk objects. Basically it does the same as your idea but instead of a > dictionary it loads fields of an objects

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

2014-05-22 13:06 GMT-03:00 Camille Teruel : > > On 22 mai 2014, at 11:54, stepharo wrote: > >> >>> In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the language >>> comes with >>> a good proxy model by default. >> >> + 1 >> We should do that with Camille. > > Yes. > Now the problem i

Re: [Pharo-users] Initializing a class with a Dictionary

Hello, I think you should look at the STON framework. STON looks like JSON for smalltalk objects. Basically it does the same as your idea but instead of a dictionary it loads fields of an objects from a STON file which looks like a JSON file (a STON is kind of an extended Dictionary exported as a

Re: [Pharo-users] Calling an arbitrary method

Hi! On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 7:46 PM, sergio_101 wrote: > In many cases, an object might have a method (filter, selector, etc) > attached to it so that the object can run the correct method.. > > for instance, an object might have a filterMethod variable with a value > 'filterByArtist'.. > > in r

Re: [Pharo-users] Calling an arbitrary method

On 22 mai 2014, at 19:46, sergio_101 wrote: > In many cases, an object might have a method (filter, selector, etc) attached > to it so that the object can run the correct method.. > > for instance, an object might have a filterMethod variable with a value > 'filterByArtist'.. > > in ruby, i

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

On 22 mai 2014, at 19:07, Luc Fabresse wrote: > > > > > 2014-05-22 18:06 GMT+02:00 Camille Teruel : > > On 22 mai 2014, at 11:54, stepharo wrote: > > > > >> In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the language > >> comes with > >> a good proxy model by default. > >

[Pharo-users] Calling an arbitrary method

In many cases, an object might have a method (filter, selector, etc) attached to it so that the object can run the correct method.. for instance, an object might have a filterMethod variable with a value 'filterByArtist'.. in ruby, i would do something like: instance.send(filter_method) how wou

[Pharo-users] Initializing a class with a Dictionary

is it possible to initialize a class with a dictionary? my first thought would be to create a method like: intializeWithDictionary: aDictionary then, loop through the elements and do something like: instVarNamed: key put: value but the book says: Caveat: Although these methods are useful for b

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

2014-05-22 18:06 GMT+02:00 Camille Teruel : > > On 22 mai 2014, at 11:54, stepharo wrote: > > > > >> In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the > language comes with > >> a good proxy model by default. > > > > + 1 > > We should do that with Camille. > > Yes. > Now the probl

Re: [Pharo-users] 3D with Pharo and OpenGL ?

you can find plenty of code in Roassal3d that I think uses the NBOpenGL library here http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~ronsaldo/roassal3d NBOpenGL is basically a wrapper for OpenGL with Nativeboost. So if you are familiar with OpenGL , C and Nativeboost you are good to go using Roassal3d as an exam

[Pharo-users] Pillar annotations for Latex

The Pillar documentation [1] says... "An annotated paragraph starts a line with @@ followed by either todo or note. For example, @@note this is a note annotation. generates Note: this is a note annotation. And, @@todo this is a todo annotation generates a todo a

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

On 22 mai 2014, at 11:54, stepharo wrote: > >> In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the language >> comes with >> a good proxy model by default. > > + 1 > We should do that with Camille. Yes. Now the problem is to agree on what is a "good model". There is many use ca

Re: [Pharo-users] Versionner: Specifying un-configured packages as dependencies

jfabry wrote > I put a high priority on the simplicity rule It's good to know the dangers, but for single packages with no dependencies, I often just add it to my project. - Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Versionner-Specifying-un-configured-packages-as-

[Pharo-users] 3D with Pharo and OpenGL ?

Hy, I'm working at Thales for a year internship and I would like to do some OpenGL demos in smalltalk. I'm searching a demo which shows the capacity to implement 3D drawing with Pharo. Does a demo already available on Pharo 3.0 ? I aim to code my own demo and for example begin with a 3D drawin

Re: [Pharo-users] Versionner: Specifying un-configured packages as dependencies

On May 22, 2014, at 5:00 AM, Christophe Demarey wrote: >> In general I am not so sure that adding configurations for one simple >> package are the way to go though. It seems like adding extra layers of >> indirection for reasons that are unclear to me. > > The reason is that any package* sho

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

We will discuss. Stef 2014-05-21 8:37 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker >: In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the language comes with a good proxy model by default. (this way we would avoid that everyone creates one that is not

Re: [Pharo-users] Ghost Proxy

In general, we should think about if is would make sense that the language comes with a good proxy model by default. + 1 We should do that with Camille. (this way we would avoid that everyone creates one that is not completely working)

Re: [Pharo-users] Versionner: Specifying un-configured packages as dependencies

Le 22 mai 2014 à 01:02, Johan Fabry a écrit : > > On May 21, 2014, at 5:07 AM, Christophe Demarey > wrote: > >> To me, it is preferable to add a configuration (even if very small) for each >> dependency outside your project. It is the way it should be done (that's why >> Versionner only all