Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

Thanks both, Alex and Doru for your quick answers. I'm using Manjaro Cinnamon Edition[1]. If you need any help with 32 bits over 64 bits systems, let me know. [1] https://manjaro.org/community-editions/ Cheers, Offray On 14/11/17 12:46, Aliaksei Syrel wrote: > Offray, which edition of Manjaro

Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

Offray, which edition of Manjaro do you have? (XFCE, KDE or Gnome) Cheers, Alex On 14 November 2017 at 18:41, Aliaksei Syrel wrote: > Hi Offray, > > I agree with your point of view. It is in our best interests to make it > work as smoothly as possible, ideally

Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

Hi Offray, I agree with your point of view. It is in our best interests to make it work as smoothly as possible, ideally automagically :) Now I will try to install Pharo6.1 on Manjaro Linux in order to see if there is something that needs to be noted in README.md. One of the biggest problems on

Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

Hi Doru, On 14/11/17 11:36, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi Offray, > > There are two issues that I take from your email. So, please allow me to > address them separately: > > 1. The process of installing the new GT (with Documenter) > GT is meant to load in Pharo 6.1. It is tested tested automatically

Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

For git / iceberg first time users: Please read the tip and tricks booklet available on http://books.pharo.org On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Aliaksei Syrel wrote: > Hi Offray, > > I understand your frustration, but with all respect, the fact that you have > problems with

Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

Hi Offray, I understand your frustration, but with all respect, the fact that you have problems with Iceberg does not mean that GT Documenter or any other GT tool is responsible for described problems. Most complains about bloc, brick, whatever is because of unrelated stuff. It is a little bit

Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

What operating system are you on? What version of Pharo do you use? Is it 32b or 64b? Cheers, Doru > On Nov 14, 2017, at 5:33 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas > wrote: > > > > On 14/11/17 10:36, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote: > > [...] >> I have thought

Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

Hi Offray, There are two issues that I take from your email. So, please allow me to address them separately: 1. The process of installing the new GT (with Documenter) GT is meant to load in Pharo 6.1. It is tested tested automatically several times a day both on Windows (Appveyor) and on Linux

Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

On 14/11/17 10:36, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote: [...] > I have thought that Git is overcomplicated for most of the developers' > tasks and communities. I don't know if the root of previous issues is > in the "Iceberg enableMetacelloIntegration: true" line, but having to > get your pair

Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

I have been just trying to install GT Documenter and is really frustrating (I have been unable to install it even for the first time!). This was the list of errors I got and steps I followed, in almost sequential order, just to get a (bittersweet!) taste of GT Documenter: * 1st:

Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

Sean why don't you try because this is the moment to push bloc people to produce simpler better solution. I should do it too. I know. Stef On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > Tudor Girba-2 wrote >> That would be another renderer, but it is not

Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

Tudor Girba-2 wrote > That would be another renderer, but it is not difficult to build. That is > something we’ll do soon. It would be nice to be able to toggle codes on/off like WS Word - Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html

Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

Hannes We will start to repackage pillar model so finding a mini pillar is interesting to us. Let let us know. Stef On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > >> On Nov 10, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: >> >> Tudor

Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

Hi, > On Nov 10, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > Tudor Girba-2 wrote >> As shown at ESUG, GT Documenter offers an advanced viewer (and editor) for >> Pillar working on top of Bloc. > > Two questions after playing with it: > 1. Can one save a live-edited

Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > Tudor Girba-2 wrote > > As shown at ESUG, GT Documenter offers an advanced viewer (and editor) > for > > Pillar working on top of Bloc. > > Two questions after playing with it: > 1. Can one save a live-edited file?

Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

Tudor Girba-2 wrote > As shown at ESUG, GT Documenter offers an advanced viewer (and editor) for > Pillar working on top of Bloc. Two questions after playing with it: 1. Can one save a live-edited file? 2. Is it possible to make the markup codes invisible? That would seem more appropriate e.g. in

Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

Ok let know. Guille worked the complete week on pillar (mainly archetype and the outputer part) and made **giant** steps. He removed most of the need for using make and we will do another cleaning first but first release Pharo 7.0.0 and its documentation. After we will remove magritte. Stef On

Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

Hi, As shown at ESUG, GT Documenter offers an advanced viewer (and editor) for Pillar working on top of Bloc. You can get it by loading: Iceberg enableMetacelloIntegration: true. Metacello new baseline: 'GToolkit'; repository: 'github://feenkcom/gtoolkit/src'; load. For example, you

Re: [Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

A note: Tudor Girba wrote: Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:31 PM Reply-To: Any question about pharo is welcome To: Any question about pharo is welcome Hi, As mentioned in an announcement about 10 days ago, we are

[Pharo-users] About implementing a "Mini Pillar" in-image renderer for Pharo ...

Hello In the thread 'including Pillar in Pharo image by default' it was suggested by Stephane Ducasse to include a subset of Pillar in the Pharo image[1] . I'd like to extend that proposal a little bit it in order to do very simple presentations. This should allow to describe at least part of