Herbert Vojčík wrote:
Denis Kudriashov wrote:
Hi Herbert.
It is a bit experimental API to allow more descriptive failures.
Evaluate following code:
(2@3) where x should equal: 10
It will give you failure message: Got "2" from (2@3) x but it should
equal "10".
But without #where
Denis Kudriashov wrote:
Hi Herbert.
It is a bit experimental API to allow more descriptive failures.
Evaluate following code:
(2@3) where x should equal: 10
It will give you failure message: Got "2" from (2@3) x but it should
equal "10".
But without #where it would be: Got "2" but
Denis Kudriashov wrote
> It will give you failure message: Got "2" from (2@3) x but it should equal
> "10".
> But without #where it would be: Got "2" but it should equal "10".
Wow, that sounds really cool. I'll have to play with it a bit to see how
much difference it makes in practice…
-
Hi Herbert.
It is a bit experimental API to allow more descriptive failures. Evaluate
following code:
(2@3) where x should equal: 10
It will give you failure message: Got "2" from (2@3) x but it should equal
"10".
But without #where it would be: Got "2" but it should equal "10".
And it works
Hello,
When I am writing tests using Mocketry's DSL, I get puzzled about how /
when to use #where, and how is it different when it's used and when it
is not?
As far as i tried, I did not find any difference. That is, pasting part
of one of my tests:
response := znClient
