Re: [Pharo-users] Tonel, Pharo 6.1 and file per class?

Done (although possibly we should note to use git and not iceberg to merge the branch?) > On 10 May 2018, at 01:54, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras > wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:36 PM, Tim Mackinnon > wrote: > > I

Re: [Pharo-users] Tonel, Pharo 6.1 and file per class?

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:36 PM, Tim Mackinnon wrote: > > I also wasn’t sure how you merge a branch back on to master with Iceberg > (can you ?) - so I just did that bit in gitlab. > > no, i didn't use iceberg. i just run the script (without the push at the end) and then i use

Re: [Pharo-users] Tonel, Pharo 6.1 and file per class?

Thats exactly what I was looking for - as I can never fathom the deep rooted directories I modified it a bit to: crntRepo := (Iceberg repositoryForPackage: BaselineOfYourApp package) backend. locationDir := crntRepo location. subDir := crntRepo subdirectory. sourceDir := locationDir. I also

Re: [Pharo-users] Tonel, Pharo 6.1 and file per class?

Tim, i've used the following script https://github.com/pharo-vcs/tonel/blob/master/MigrateFromFileTree.md in my pet projects. hope this helps. On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:22 PM, Tim Mackinnon wrote: > Hmmm - I don’t think I’ve fully understood the instructions. If I already >

Re: [Pharo-users] Tonel, Pharo 6.1 and file per class?

Hmmm - I don’t think I’ve fully understood the instructions. If I already have a project in filetree git format - does creating the .properties file work? What do I do to convert it to tonel format? I think I’ve noticed a few announcements where people have said they’ve moved to the new tonel

Re: [Pharo-users] Tonel, Pharo 6.1 and file per class?

Ah - I missed that piece of information - could that be put on the iceberg readme.md? In fact - I’ll submit a pr so you can keep motoring on getting it all to work (I really want a stable git environment - we are getting sooo close). Tim > On 9 May 2018, at 11:34, Esteban Lorenzano

Re: [Pharo-users] Tonel, Pharo 6.1 and file per class?

Esteban Lorenzano wrote: the problem is that tonel relies in a .properties file to know a repository format. and for backward compatibility, if this .properties file is not present, iceberg assumes the repository is a plain old “filetree” repository. so, until we figure out how to provide

Re: [Pharo-users] Tonel, Pharo 6.1 and file per class?

the problem is that tonel relies in a .properties file to know a repository format. and for backward compatibility, if this .properties file is not present, iceberg assumes the repository is a plain old “filetree” repository. so, until we figure out how to provide both things (a nice tonel

Re: [Pharo-users] Tonel, Pharo 6.1 and file per class?

Yes, it is insanely hard to write project in tonel format. Needs lot of hacking here and there, setting the setting itself is not helpful. I managed to, somehow, but I forgot the algorithm already. I am dreadful as to when I will need to do it again. Takes lots of time and nerves. Herby On

Re: [Pharo-users] Tonel, Pharo 6.1 and file per class?

Can't really speak for 6.1 but on 7 things are definitively Tonel based (unless you use existing/older repos). Tracking Iceberg is best done in 7 (if you can live with an actively developed system). > On 9 May 2018, at 11:54, Tim Mackinnon wrote: > > Hi guys - With all the

[Pharo-users] Tonel, Pharo 6.1 and file per class?

Hi guys - With all the talk about iceberg changes, I’ve stayed away from it for a bit (6 months) - but downloaded a new 6.1 image a few weeks ago and went to version some stuff yesterday into a new project. Iceberg seems a bit more stable - but it still seems to write out individual methods as