Re: [Pharo-users] Could Pharo be more idiot-proof?

2014-02-04 Thread PBK Research
Lyons Sent: 03 February 2014 18:52 To: Any question about pharo is welcome Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Could Pharo be more idiot-proof? PBK Research writes: As a supplementary point, I am trying to use PetitParser to parse natural language. From the examples it is clear that PP is designed

Re: [Pharo-users] Could Pharo be more idiot-proof?

2014-02-03 Thread PBK Research
: [Pharo-users] Could Pharo be more idiot-proof? Open a new workspace. In the title bar there is a small black triangle (Window menu). Close to the end, you should find 'Previous contents' With a bit of luck, it should be there Ben On 03 Feb 2014, at 11:35, PBK Research pe

Re: [Pharo-users] Could Pharo be more idiot-proof?

2014-02-03 Thread Pharo4Stef
I have just done something stupid, so this is just letting off steam (and maybe looking for someone else to blame!). Don’t worry. :) I have been playing with Moose (version 4.8), mainly because I want to experiment with PetitParser. I am struggling a bit, but getting somewhere I think.

Re: [Pharo-users] Could Pharo be more idiot-proof?

2014-02-03 Thread Daniel Lyons
PBK Research writes: As a supplementary point, I am trying to use PetitParser to parse natural language. From the examples it is clear that PP is designed with formal languages in mind. Am I wasting my time using it on natural languages? Has anyone else tried this? What are you trying to do