[Pharo-users] Insecure issue tracker registration

Hi, I announced my concerns on Discord already, but got no reaction, so I post it here as well to have it properly archived. "A colleague just noticed that the registration for the issue tracker is HTTP-only. This is not an appropriate choice for sensitive data like a password. Any

[Pharo-users] Why doesn't Iceberg checkin other assets (scripts) but does check them out?

Hi - my second attempt at using Pharo with Git has proven very satisfying (I saw the potential in phase 1, but it was often difficult to understand what was happening and the workflow to use). One thing that has come up a few times for me however - and its something that using git nicely

Re: [Pharo-users] Insecure issue tracker registration

On 13 June 2018 at 16:25, Manuel Leuenberger wrote: > Hi, > > I announced my concerns on Discord already, but got no reaction, so I post > it here as well to have it properly archived. > > "A colleague just noticed that the registration for the issue tracker is > HTTP-only. This is not an

Re: [Pharo-users] Iceberg - finding deleted classes, reverting versions?

Tim Mackinnon wrote > Hi - I am interested in what the future holds with Iceberg for things like > finding deleted classes or reverting to older versions of things. Great question! It used to be in the Change Sorter that delections were logged and reversible. At some point that stopped working

[Pharo-users] Iceberg - finding deleted classes, reverting versions?

Hi - I am interested in what the future holds with Iceberg for things like finding deleted classes or reverting to older versions of things. As we tend to use lots of classes in Smalltalk (and view them as cheap) - I often create them, then move behaviour around and delete things I don’t need

Re: [Pharo-users] Why doesn't Iceberg checkin other assets (scripts) but does check them out?

On 13/06/2018 11:50, Tim Mackinnon wrote: > Hi - my second attempt at using Pharo with Git has proven very satisfying (I > saw the potential in phase 1, but it was often difficult to understand what > was happening and the workflow to use). > > One thing that has come up a few times for me

[Pharo-users] Fwd: ApplicationSecurity Questions

FYI -- Forwarded message -- From: Hernán Morales Durand Date: 2018-06-13 13:44 GMT-03:00 Subject: Re: ApplicationSecurity Questions To: Sean DeNigris Hi Sean, Sorry for the delayed reply, almost no time for anything here 2018-06-08 10:20 GMT-03:00 Sean DeNigris : > You can

Re: [Pharo-users] Iceberg - finding deleted classes, reverting versions?

Hi Sean - that is an excellent reply, I didn’t quite get your fu to work - but if you look up how to find deleted classes in git they give the following: git log --diff-filter=D --summary This gives you a git list of checkins and shows you the checkin comment, along with the list of files that

[Pharo-users] [ANN] ba-st Web Stack new versions available

Check the announcement at https://medium.com/ba-st/web-stack-june-release-bbfb2674b11. Anyone interested in joining our ba-st projects is welcomed. Regards, Gabriel Cotelli, Maxi Tabacman and all the contributors.

Re: [Pharo-users] Why doesn't Iceberg checkin other assets (scripts) but does check them out?

Esteban - so I don't then understand why iceberg (usefully in my view) checks out more than the src directory, if it’s only focusing on the Pharo blob? I’m guessing that by knowing where the src is, you are just committing that part of the tree with libgit? Perhaps from a pragmatic first step

Re: [Pharo-users] Iceberg - finding deleted classes, reverting versions?

Hi Sean - I tried it again, and it worked: git log --full-history -- */PrismicBlock.class* (I got my wildcard slightly wrong for tonel format) - although the beauty of the one I gave was that it shows you all deleted classes (in case you don’t know the name) I’m still confused why I can’t

Re: [Pharo-users] Why doesn't Iceberg checkin other assets (scripts) but does check them out?

> On 13 Jun 2018, at 22:44, Tim Mackinnon wrote: > > Esteban - so I don't then understand why iceberg (usefully in my view) checks > out more than the src directory, if it’s only focusing on the Pharo blob? > > I’m guessing that by knowing where the src is, you are just committing that >

Re: [Pharo-users] Why doesn't Iceberg checkin other assets (scripts) but does check them out?

hi, > On 13 Jun 2018, at 16:50, Tim Mackinnon wrote: > > Hi - my second attempt at using Pharo with Git has proven very satisfying (I > saw the potential in phase 1, but it was often difficult to understand what > was happening and the workflow to use). > > One thing that has come up a few

[Pharo-users] [ann] gt documenter

Hi, We are happy to announce a new leap of GToolkit Documenter, the tool for manipulating live documents directly in the development environment: https://github.com/feenkcom/gtoolkit-documenter Documenter is part of the second generation GToolkit project, it is based on Bloc and works with the

Re: [Pharo-users] Iceberg - finding deleted classes, reverting versions?

Tim Mackinnon wrote > I didn’t quite get your fu to work Interesting. When I searched for commits affecting the deleted class SuDebianKey: $ git log --full-history -- */SuDebianKey.class/properties.json I got back a list of commits (obviously with the last chronologically being the deletion):

Re: [Pharo-users] Why doesn't Iceberg checkin other assets (scripts) but does check them out?

> yeah… but is a lot of work and no time just right now. > long term, it would be cool to manage everything from iceberg. > but reality check, is a huge amount of work so it has to come step by step. Fair enough - its pretty cool we’ve got this far, and I guess the onus is on the rest of us to