Re: [Pharo-users] String concatenation vs. Stream

> Am 18.10.2019 um 11:33 schrieb Kasper Østerbye : > > On 18 October 2019 at 08.00.13, Richard O'Keefe (rao...@gmail.com > ) wrote: >> When is it pointless to introduce a WriteStream and just use #, ? >> When #, would not be in a loop or recursion. >> Constructing

Re: [Pharo-users] String concatenation vs. Stream

On 18 October 2019 at 08.00.13, Richard O'Keefe (rao...@gmail.com) wrote: When is it pointless to introduce a WriteStream and just use #, ? When #, would not be in a loop or recursion. Constructing error messages, class initialisation code, that sort of thing. If you find yourself doing a lot of

Re: [Pharo-users] String concatenation vs. Stream

> On 18 Oct 2019, at 07:59, Richard O'Keefe wrote: > > When is it pointless to introduce a WriteStream and just use #, ? > When #, would not be in a loop or recursion. > Constructing error messages, class initialisation code, that sort of thing. > > If you find yourself doing a lot of

Re: [Pharo-users] String concatenation vs. Stream

Sent: Friday, 18 October 2019 2:38 AM To: Any question about pharo is welcome Subject: [Pharo-users] String concatenation vs. Stream EXTERNAL: Do not click links or open attachments if you do not recognize the sender. This is an old one, and I knew of cause that one should not use #, when you

[Pharo-users] String concatenation vs. Stream

This is an old one, and I knew of cause that one should not use #, when you can use streams instead. But that is was this bad to use #, came as a surprise I must say Best, Kasper